Literature DB >> 8050244

A prospective study of surgically treated acetabular fractures.

P D Ruesch1, H Holdener, M Ciaramitaro, J W Mast.   

Abstract

Between November 1988 and March 1993, 101 patients with 102 fractures of the acetabulum were referred to the authors' institution. They included 31 both column; 25 transverse associated posterior wall; 16 anterior column associated posterior hemitransverse; 9 posterior wall; 7 posterior column associated posterior wall; 7 anterior column; 5 T shaped; and 2 transverse fractures. Thirteen fractures were excluded, leaving 89 patients with 89 operatively treated fractures available for followup. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for adequacy of reduction and scored on a scale of 1-9 with 9 being perfect. Perfect or near perfect reduction was achieved in 82% of patients. A minimum of 1 year followup was available for 53 patients. Clinical results were assessed in terms of the patients' activities and included their ability to walk, range of motion and pain. Excellent results were achieved in 27 patients and an additional 16 had satisfactory results, for an overall 81% acceptable outcome. Radiographic evidence of posttraumatic osteoarthrosis was present in 40% of patients: mild in 10, moderate in 5, and severe in 5. Heterotopic ossification was Brooker Grade III and Grade IV in 1 patient each. These results indicate that operative treatment of acetabular fractures provides results that are superior to those achieved with nonoperative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8050244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Acetabular fractures].

Authors:  A Gänsslen; H J Oestern
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Acetabular fractures labelled poor surgical choices: Analysis of operative outcome.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Gupta; Nipun Jindal; Manish Pruthi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-03-21

3.  The use of an algorithm for classifying acetabular fractures: a role for resident education?

Authors:  Thuan V Ly; Michael D Stover; Stephen H Sims; Mark C Reilly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Fractures of posterior wall of acetabulum.

Authors:  F Y Chiu; W H Lo; T H Chen; C M Chen; C K Huang; H L Ma
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Comparative study of W-shaped angular plate and reconstruction plate in treating posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wei Chen; Xiaobo Wu; Yanling Su; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Operative management of acetabular fracture: A 10-year experience in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Etemadifar; Amin Nemati; Mojde Chinigarzade
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 7.  Is radiation superior to indomethacin to prevent heterotopic ossification in acetabular fractures?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taco J Blokhuis; Jan Paul M Frölke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  ANALYSIS OF THE SEGMENTAL IMPACTION OF FEMORAL HEAD FOLLOWING AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE SURGICALLY MANAGED.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Carina Cohen; Daniel Daniachi; Nelson Keiske Ono; Emerson Kiyoshi Honda; Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello; Walter Riccioli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08

9.  PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON SEVENTY-SIX CASES OF FRACTURED ACETABULUM WITH SURGICAL TREATMENT.

Authors:  André Gaudêncio Ignácio de Almeida; Carlos Antônio Garrido; Leonardo Eustáquio Vaz Amaral; Luiz Fernando Lindenberg Vargas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

10.  Outcome of surgical treatment for displaced acetabular fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sahu Ramji Lal
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-12-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.