Literature DB >> 8049425

Prospective comparative trial of autologous versus allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

V Ratanatharathorn1, J Uberti, C Karanes, E Abella, L G Lum, F Momin, G Cummings, L L Sensenbrenner.   

Abstract

A prospective comparative trial of allogeneic versus autologous bone marrow transplant (BMT) was conducted. Sixty-six consecutive patients (median age, 41; range, 15 to 60; female:male ratio = 21:45) entered this clinical trial. Priority for allogeneic BMT was given to patients who were 55 or younger and had a major histocompatibility complex-matched or 1-antigen-disparate sibling donor. Autologous BMT was offered to all other patients whose age was 60 or younger. Patients who had no sibling donor and who had BM involvement at the time of evaluation were not eligible. Thirty-one patients received an allograft, and 35 patients received an autograft. Thirteen patients received a BM graft purged with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide because of previous BM involvement. Patients who had previous radiation to the thoracic and/or abdominal areas of more than 20 Gy received a preparative regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide (1,800 mg/m2/d for 4 days), VP-16 (200 mg/m2 every 12 hours for 8 doses), and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (600 mg/m2 as 1 dose). Other patients received cyclophosphamide 1,800 mg/m2/d for 4 days followed by total body irradiation of 12 Gy administered as a single daily fraction over 4 days. With a median follow-up of 14 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) for autograft and allograft recipients was 24% +/- 8% (+/- SE) and 47% +/- 9%, respectively, (P = .21). However, the probability of disease progression was significantly higher in the autologous group (69% +/- 9%) than in the allogeneic group (20% +/- 10%; P = .001). When other confounding prognostic factors were adjusted in the multivariate analysis, chemosensitive disease and allograft were found to have a significant favorable influence on probability of disease progression (P = .03 and .003), but only chemosensitive disease had a significant influence on the PFS (P < .002). Our results suggest the existence of graft-versus-lymphoma effect and also support the rationale of using immunotherapy after autologous BMT. Allogeneic BMT should be preferable to autologous BMT in younger patients with lymphoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8049425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  38 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim.

Authors:  Jeff Schriber
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Current status of allogeneic transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Koen van Besien
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning in patients with T-cell and natural killer-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Andrei R Shustov; Theodore A Gooley; Brenda M Sandmaier; Judith Shizuru; Mohamed L Sorror; Firoozeh Sahebi; Peter McSweeney; Dietger Niederwieser; Benedetto Bruno; Rainer Storb; David G Maloney
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Variable incidence of cyclosporine and FK-506 neurotoxicity in hematopoeitic malignancies and marrow conditions after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; Zella R Zeigler; Richard K Shadduck; John Lister
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Allogeneic stem cell transplant provides durable response in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Dipenkumar Modi; Malini Surapaneni; Seongho Kim; Lois Ayash; Asif Alavi; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Abhinav Deol; Joseph P Uberti
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 6.  Principles and overview of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Michael R Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

7.  Sequential myeloablative autologous stem cell transplantation and reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is safe and feasible in children, adolescents and young adults with poor-risk refractory or recurrent Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  P Satwani; Z Jin; P L Martin; M Bhatia; J H Garvin; D George; S Chaudhury; J Talano; E Morris; L Harrison; J Sosna; M Peterson; O Militano; S Foley; J Kurtzberg; M S Cairo
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  A comparison of HLA-identical sibling allogeneic versus autologous transplantation for diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a report from the CIBMTR.

Authors:  Hillard M Lazarus; Mei-Jie Zhang; Jeanette Carreras; Brandon M Hayes-Lattin; Asli Selmin Ataergin; Jacob D Bitran; Brian J Bolwell; César O Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; Steven C Goldstein; Gregory A Hale; David J Inwards; Thomas R Klumpp; David I Marks; Richard T Maziarz; Philip L McCarthy; Santiago Pavlovsky; J Douglas Rizzo; Thomas C Shea; Harry C Schouten; Shimon Slavin; Jane N Winter; Koen van Besien; Julie M Vose; Parameswaran N Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficacy in the rituximab era and comparison to first allogeneic transplants. A report from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party.

Authors:  S P Robinson; A Boumendil; H Finel; D Blaise; X Poiré; E Nicolas-Virelizier; R Or; R Malladi; A Corby; L Fornecker; D Caballero; D Pohlreich; A Nagler; C Thieblemont; J Finke; E Bachy; L Vincent; W Schroyens; H Schouten; P Dreger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Graft-versus-leukemia effect of nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Masahiro Imamura; Junji Tanaka
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.