Literature DB >> 8048848

Outcomes following injury in a predominantly rural-population-based trauma center.

S Norwood1, M B Myers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, severity, and outcomes of injury in patients treated in a rural-based level I trauma center and to compare the outcomes with a nationally indexed patient population--the Major Trauma Outcome Study.
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of trauma registry data.
SETTING: State of Illinois designated level I trauma center located in Urbana. PATIENTS: A total of 2246 trauma patients admitted from August 1989 through August 1992, with a mortality cohort of 158 patients. There were 1735 patients (77%) with Injury Severity Scores less than or equal to 19 and 511 patients (23%) with more severe injuries (Injury Severity Scores > or = 20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality rates using the TRISS method, the Major Trauma Outcome Study, and final patient dispositions.
RESULTS: The overall mortality rate, excluding those patients who were pronounced dead on arrival, was 125/2213 (5.6%). Eighty-six (69%) of these 125 patients had neurological Abbreviated Injury Scores of 3 or greater, with neurotrauma being a major contributor to their deaths. The m-statistic was 0.99 and the z-statistic was -3.30 for the entire group. The observed probability of survival met or exceeded the expected probability of survival when compared with the Major Trauma Outcome Study in all categories.
CONCLUSION: Acceptable mortality rates compared with the Major Trauma Outcome Study can be achieved in a rural-community-based level I trauma center despite relatively small numbers of critically injured patients. Such outcomes may assist in justifying resource allocation for trauma centers in rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8048848     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420320022003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  5 in total

1.  Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Craig D Newgard; Richard J Mullins; Melanie Arthur; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Trauma center maturation: quantification of process and outcome.

Authors:  A B Peitzman; A P Courcoulas; C Stinson; A O Udekwu; T R Billiar; B G Harbrecht
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  [Trauma network of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (DGU). Establishment, organization, and quality assurance of a regional trauma network of the DGU].

Authors:  S Ruchholtz; C A Kühne; H Siebert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  State of the art: noninvasive imaging and management of neurovascular trauma.

Authors:  Charles E Ray; Shaun C Spalding; C Clay Cothren; Wei-Shin Wang; Ernest E Moore; Stephen P Johnson
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A comparison of rural versus urban trauma care.

Authors:  Ari M Lipsky; Larry L Karsteadt; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Sharon Hartmans; Frederick S Bongard; Henry Gill Cryer; Patricia B Ekhardt; Anthony J Loffredo; Patricia D Farmer; Susan C Whitney; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.