Literature DB >> 8048479

31P-MRS measurements of extracellular pH of tumors using 3-aminopropylphosphonate.

R J Gillies1, Z Liu, Z Bhujwalla.   

Abstract

The extracellular pH (pHex) of tumors is generally acidic. However, it is only recently that noninvasive magnetic resonance spectroscopic (MRS) measurements have determined that the intracellular pH (pHin) of tumor cells in situ is neutral or slightly alkaline compared with that of normal tissues. Thus cells in tumors maintain larger pH gradients than do cells in nontumor tissues. To date, measurements of pHex in tumors have been made using microelectrodes, which preclude measurement of pHex and pHin within the same preparation. In addition, microelectrodes are invasive and have the potential to alter the measured pH values. The present communication describes simultaneous measurement of pHex and pHin in vitro in bioreactor culture and in vivo using 31P-MRS analyses of 3-aminopropylphosphonate (3-APP) and inorganic phosphate. In vitro results indicate that 3-APP is not toxic and that its resonant frequency is sensitive to pH and not significantly affected by temperature or ionic strength. Bioreactor experiments indicate that this compound is neither internalized nor metabolized by cells. Experiments in vivo indicate that 3-APP can be administered intraperitoneally and that RIF-1 tumors maintain a steady-state pHin of 7.25 and a pHex of 6.66. These data have significance to basic tumor cell physiology and to the design of approaches to cancer chemotherapy and hyperthermic therapy, because both of these modalities exhibit pH sensitivity. It is also likely that these techniques will be applicable to localized MRS of other organ systems in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8048479     DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.267.1.C195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  117 in total

1.  Response of hepatoma 9618a and normal liver to host carbogen and carbon monoxide breathing.

Authors:  S P Robinson; L M Rodrigues; J R Griffiths; M Stubbs
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: tumor biology and physiology.

Authors:  R J Gillies; Z M Bhujwalla; J Evelhoch; M Garwood; M Neeman; S P Robinson; C H Sotak; B Van Der Sanden
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 3.  Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  J L Evelhoch; R J Gillies; G S Karczmar; J A Koutcher; R J Maxwell; O Nalcioglu; N Raghunand; S M Ronen; B D Ross; H M Swartz
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 4.  Causes and effects of heterogeneous perfusion in tumors.

Authors:  R J Gillies; P A Schornack; T W Secomb; N Raghunand
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  Cancer nanomedicines targeting tumor extracellular pH.

Authors:  Li Tian; You Han Bae
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.268

6.  Neurochemical and cellular reorganization of the spinal cord in a murine model of bone cancer pain.

Authors:  M J Schwei; P Honore; S D Rogers; J L Salak-Johnson; M P Finke; M L Ramnaraine; D R Clohisy; P W Mantyh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yuzhe Sun; Edward Davis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  pH-Sensitive MR Responses Induced by Dendron-Functionalized SPIONs.

Authors:  Indrajit Saha; Kathleen E Chaffee; Chuansong Duanmu; Brooke M Woods; Ashley M Stokes; Laura E Buck; Laura L Walkup; Narsimha Sattenapally; Jodi Huggenvik; Yong Gao; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Molecular Imaging of Cancer: Applications of Magnetic Resonance Methods.

Authors:  Barjor Gimi; Arvind P Pathak; Ellen Ackerstaff; Kristine Glunde; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 10.961

10.  Brain temperature by Biosensor Imaging of Redundant Deviation in Shifts (BIRDS): comparison between TmDOTP5- and TmDOTMA-.

Authors:  Daniel Coman; Hubert K Trubel; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.