Literature DB >> 8045499

Monoethylglicinexylidide test: a prognostic indicator of survival in cirrhosis.

A Arrigoni1, T Gindro, G Aimo, N Cappello, A Meloni, P Benedetti, G P Molino, G Verme, M Rizzetto.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value of the monoethylglicinexylidide assay, a dynamic liver function test based on the determination of the serum concentration of lidocaine major metabolite, as a predictor of survival in cirrhosis. For this purpose, the predictive value of monoethylglicinexylidide was evaluated in comparison with the Pugh score, ascites, encephalopathy and a number of different biochemical parameters as collected from the prospective follow-up of 118 patients with cirrhosis. A stepwise regression analysis was performed on the variables of prognostic value according to the Cox model and with respect to 1-yr survival; because Pugh score and monoethylglicinexylidide were the sole variables selected, they were proved to supply independent prognostic information. The most reliable cutoff values for discrimination between death and survival were 25 ng/ml or less for monoethylglicinexylidide and less than 9 for the Pugh score. In 74 patients without overt signs of liver failure (i.e., Pugh < or = 9), monoethylglicinexylidide provided a wide range of results (i.e., 4 to 77 ng/ml), namely values ranging from very low to elevated. Of the 38 patients with satisfactory Pugh scores (< or = 9) but poor monoethylglicinexylidide values (< or = 25), 11 died during follow-up and 3 underwent liver transplantation, despite having shown no clinical signs of liver failure at entry. On the bases of discriminant levels, the monoethylglicinexylidide test is suitable for adoption as a reliable and sensitive indicator of survival in patients with cirrhosis because it supplies more accurate prognostic information compared with the Pugh score.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8045499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  8 in total

1.  Oral or intravenous lidocaine administration to perform megx test?

Authors:  E Giannini; F Botta; P Romagnoli; R Testa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study.

Authors:  F Botta; E Giannini; P Romagnoli; A Fasoli; F Malfatti; B Chiarbonello; E Testa; D Risso; G Colla; R Testa
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide serum determinations to analyze liver function of cirrhotic patients after oral administration.

Authors:  A E Muñoz; C Miguez; M Rubio; M Bartellini; D Levi; A Podestá; V Niselman; R Terg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of MEGX (monoethylglycinexylidide) and antipyrine tests in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  J Wojcicki; K Kozlowski; M Drozdzik; M Wojcicki
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 5.  Value of Liver Function Tests in Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Praveen Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-14

6.  Child-Pugh versus MELD score in predicting survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  B Angermayr; M Cejna; F Karnel; M Gschwantler; F Koenig; J Pidlich; H Mendel; L Pichler; M Wichlas; A Kreil; M Schmid; A Ferlitsch; E Lipinski; H Brunner; J Lammer; P Ferenci; A Gangl; M Peck-Radosavljevic
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  [Acute liver failure. Current aspects of diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  M Bauer; M Paxian; A Kortgen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Steady-state pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in patients with mild and moderate liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Robert Hermann; Nassr Nassr; Gezim Lahu; Eva Péterfai; Dietrich Knoerzer; Rolf Herzog; Karl Zech; Christian de Mey
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.