Literature DB >> 8045482

[The assessment of the facial profile in relation to head posture].

H Pancherz1, A M Milat.   

Abstract

On the basis of Schwarz's [21] facial typology, soft tissue facial profile was evaluated in relation to 3 head positions: natural head position, head position according to the Frankfurter Horizontal, and head position according to a subjective personal appraisal of an aesthetically pleasing profile, i.e. aesthetic head position. Forty children (20 girls and 20 boys) and 40 adults (20 women and 20 men) with varying occlusal relationships constituted the study group. Facial photos oriented according to the above 3 head positions were evaluated. The results revealed that head posture had a decisive impact on the outcome of the facial profile evaluation. Significant differences existed between natural head position on the one hand and Frankfurter Horizontal and aesthetic head position on the other. Due to the relatively large methodological error in the registration of natural head position, and the resulting effect of this error on profile evaluation, natural head position can lead to misleading results. The advantage of Frankfurter Horizontal as opposed to aesthetic head position is the result of a subjective appraisal. Thus, when using Schwarz's method in evaluating facial profile, Frankfurter Horizontal still appears to be quite appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8045482     DOI: 10.1007/bf02341483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  13 in total

1.  A biostatic investigation. The standing posture of man theoretically and statometrically illustrated.

Authors:  A MOLHAVE
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1960

2.  A comparison between estimated and registered natural head posture.

Authors:  A Lundström; C M Forsberg; H Westergren; F Lundström
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Head posture and craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  B Solow; A Tallgren
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  The relationship between craniofacial morphology, head posture and spinal curvature in 8, 11 and 15-year-old children.

Authors:  E Hellsing; J McWilliam; T Reigo; E Spangfort
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology.

Authors:  K J Showfety; P S Vig; S Matteson; C Phillips
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Bass orthopedic appliance system. Part 2. Diagnosis and appliance prescription.

Authors:  N M Bass
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1987-05

7.  Hyoid bone position, facial morphology and head posture in adults.

Authors:  A Tallgren; B Solow
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Natural head position in standing subjects.

Authors:  B Solow; A Tallgren
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  F Lundström; A Lundström
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study.

Authors:  M S Cooke; S H Wei
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.