Literature DB >> 8045143

Continuous intravenous infusions of lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation during mechanical ventilatory support: a prospective, randomized study.

A S Pohlman1, K P Simpson, J B Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous infusions of lorazepam vs. midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: Large, urban university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty adult medical ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either lorazepam or midazolam. The infusion rate was adjusted at the bedside by the ICU nurse according to a standardized study protocol to achieve and maintain sedation at Ramsay's sedation level 2 or 3.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ten patients were randomized to receive lorazepam and ten to receive midazolam. The groups were similar in demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, ICU admission diagnosis, underlying disease processes, and supplemental analgesic administration. The mean time to achieve initial adequate sedation was 124 mins for lorazepam and 105 mins for midazolam. The mean infusion rate at the point of initial sedation was 0.06 mg/kg/hr for lorazepam and 0.15 mg/kg/hr for midazolam. The maximum and mean infusion rates for the entire study period were 0.1 and 0.06 mg/kg/hr, respectively, for lorazepam and 0.29 and 0.24 mg/kg/hr, respectively, for midazolam. The number of infusion rate adjustments per day was 1.9 mg/kg/hr for lorazepam and 3.6 mg/kg/hr for midazolam. Of the surviving patients, the mean time to return to baseline mental status after discontinuation of the benzodiazepine infusion was 261 mins for lorazepam and 1815 mins for midazolam. The mean volume of fluid per day required to deliver the maximum dose of benzodiazepine was 1.2 L for lorazepam (maximum 2.4 L) and 1.3 L for midazolam (maximum 3.6 L).
CONCLUSIONS: While there was a tendency to a longer time required for return to baseline mental status in patients receiving midazolam, this was not statistically significant. Findings of interest concerning both midazolam and lorazepam were: a) time to achieve sedation in medical ICU patients is often prolonged; b) actual dose requirements necessary to maintain sedation in this patient population are larger than the current literature describes; c) time to awaken after discontinuation of the infusion was occasionally delayed for > 24 hrs; d) large volumes of fluid were required to deliver these doses of drug via this route of administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8045143     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199408000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolving targets for sedation during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Steven D Pearson; Bhakti K Patel
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 2.  Sedation for critically ill or injured adults in the intensive care unit: a shifting paradigm.

Authors:  Derek J Roberts; Babar Haroon; Richard I Hall
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Sedation, sleep promotion, and delirium screening practices in the care of mechanically ventilated children: a wake-up call for the pediatric critical care community*.

Authors:  Sapna R Kudchadkar; Myron Yaster; Naresh M Punjabi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Postoperative analgesia and sedation in the adult intensive care unit: a guide to drug selection.

Authors:  Linda L Liu; Michael A Gropper
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sedatives and analgesics in the treatment of agitated critically ill patients.

Authors:  B K Wagner; D A O'Hara
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Correlation between midazolam and lignocaine pharmacokinetics and MEGX formation in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Eleonora L Swart; Ben van der Hoven; A B Johan Groeneveld; Daniel J Touw; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  [Analgesia and sedation in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  E Schaffrath; R Kuhlen; P H Tonner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Optimizing Sedation Management to Promote Early Mobilization for Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Mary Saliski; Sapna R Kudchadkar
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Butorphanol versus Propofol in Patients Undergoing Noninvasive Ventilation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Xiaohong Wang; Jianbiao Meng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 10.  Optimizing sedation in patients with acute brain injury.

Authors:  Mauro Oddo; Ilaria Alice Crippa; Sangeeta Mehta; David Menon; Jean-Francois Payen; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.