Literature DB >> 8044945

Effects of treatment on outcome in mildly symptomatic patients with ischemia during daily life. The Atenolol Silent Ischemia Study (ASIST)

C J Pepine1, P F Cohn, P C Deedwania, R S Gibson, E Handberg, J A Hill, E Miller, R G Marks, U Thadani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection of asymptomatic ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease has been associated with increased risk for adverse outcome, but treatment of patients with asymptomatic ischemia remains controversial. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine if treatment reduces adverse outcome in patients with daily life ischemia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic outpatients with daily life silent ischemia due to coronary artery disease was conducted. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival at 1 year by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Events were death, resuscitated ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, aggravation of angina, or revascularization. The secondary outcome was ischemia during ambulatory ECG monitoring at 4 weeks. Three hundred six outpatients with mild or no angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II), abnormal exercise tests, and ischemia on ambulatory monitoring were randomized to receive either atenolol (100 mg/d) or placebo. After 4 weeks of treatment, the number (mean +/- SD, 3.6 +/- 4.2 versus 1.7 +/- 4.6 episodes, P < .001) and average duration (30 +/- 3.3 versus 16.4 +/- 6.7 minutes, P < .001) of ischemic episodes per 48 hours of ambulatory monitoring decreased in atenolol- compared with placebo-assigned patients (4.4 +/- 4.6 to 3.1 +/- 6.0 episodes and 36.6 +/- 4.1 to 30 +/- 5.5 minutes). Event-free survival improved in atenolol-treated patients (P < .0066), who had an increased time to onset of first adverse event (120 versus 79 days) and fewer total first events compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence intervals, 0.26 to 0.75; P = .001). There was a nonsignificant trend for fewer serious events (death, resuscitation from ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina) in atenolol-treated patients (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence intervals, 0.22 to 1.33; P = .175). The most powerful univariate and multivariate correlate of event-free survival was absence of ischemia on ambulatory monitoring at 4 weeks. Side effects were mild and generally similar comparing atenolol- and placebo-treated patients, although bradycardia was more frequent with atenolol.
CONCLUSIONS: Atenolol treatment reduced daily life ischemia and was associated with reduced risk for adverse outcome in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044945     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

1.  Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Updating guidelines on stable angina.

Authors:  T Lancaster; M Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

3.  Recognising "painless" heart attacks.

Authors:  C-K Wong; H D White
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Trial to show the impact of nicorandil in angina (IONA): design, methodology, and management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Using stress testing to guide primary prevention of coronary heart disease among intermediate-risk patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Z Galper; Andrew Moran; Pamela G Coxson; Mark J Pletcher; Paul Heidenreich; Lawrence D Lazar; Nicolas Rodondi; Y Claire Wang; Lee Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

Review 7.  Advancements in pharmacotherapy for angina.

Authors:  Ankur Jain; Islam Y Elgendy; Mohammad Al-Ani; Nayan Agarwal; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 8.  Antianginal actions of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Authors:  Stephen T O'Rourke
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 9.  The clinical significance of continuous ECG (ambulatory ECG or Holter) monitoring of the ST-segment to evaluate ischemia: a review.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Benjamin M Scirica; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 10.  [Long term electrocardiography (Holter monitoring)].

Authors:  Axel Brandes; Klaus-Peter Bethge
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.