Literature DB >> 8044619

Requirement for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery.

P Burke1, K Mealy, P Gillen, W Joyce, O Traynor, J Hyland.   

Abstract

To determine whether mechanical bowel preparation influences the incidence of anastomotic dehiscence following colorectal surgery, 186 patients undergoing elective left colonic or rectal resection were randomized before surgery to bowel preparation (n = 89) or no bowel preparation (n = 97). Surgical technique was standardized and no patient had a defunctioning colostomy. Seventeen patients were excluded (seven with preparation, ten without). Indications for surgery in the remaining 169 patients were carcinoma (133 patients), diverticular disease (26), inflammatory bowel disease (six) and miscellaneous conditions (four). Operations performed were left colonic resection or reversal of Hartmann's procedure (26 with preparation, 28 without) and anterior resection (56 versus 59). The overall morbidity rate (18 per cent) was similar in the two groups. All seven clinical anastomotic leaks occurred after low anterior resection, in three of the 39 patients who had undergone bowel preparation and four of the 36 who had not (P > 0.9). Two deaths occurred, both of patients who had received bowel preparation, one being secondary to anastomotic leakage. Bowel preparation does not influence outcome after elective colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044619     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  41 in total

Review 1.  Bio-ecological control of perioperative and ITU morbidity.

Authors:  Stig Bengmark
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Cao; J Li; F Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Bowel preparation: current status.

Authors:  James E Duncan; Christie M Quietmeyer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

4.  Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; José Manuel Ramirez; Daniel Callejo; Xavier Viñas; Sergio Maeso; Roger Cabezali; Elena Miranda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Laparoscopic colon resection: To prep or not to prep? Analysis of 1535 patients.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Simone Arolfo; Maurizio Degiuli; Giuseppe Giraudo; Silvio Volpatto; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Surgical treatment of ileus. Differential diagnosis and therapeutic results].

Authors:  M E Kreis; K W Jauch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Authors:  Cagla Eskicioglu; Shawn S Forbes; Darlene S Fenech; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Mechanical bowel preparation does not affect the intramucosal bacterial colony count.

Authors:  Bärbel Jung; Peter Matthiessen; Kenneth Smedh; Erik Nilsson; Ulrika Ransjö; Lars Påhlman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Preoperative optimization of Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Jonathan E Efron; Tonia M Young-Fadok
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.