Literature DB >> 8044493

Oxygen consumption, heart rate and oxygen pulse associated with selected exercise-to-muscle class elements.

P Abernethy1, P Batman.   

Abstract

The purpose of the investigation was to determine the relative oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate and oxygen pulse associated with the constituent elements of an exercise-to-music class. Six women exercise-to-music leaders with a mean(s.d.) age, weight and height of 33.2(5.2) years, 51.0(2.8) kg and 157.9(5.6) cm respectively, completed five distinct exercise-to-music movement elements. The movement elements were of a locomoter (circuit, jump and low impact) and callisthenic (prone and side/supine) nature. The movement elements were distinguishable from one another in terms of their movement patterns, posture and tempo. Relative VO2 values were greatest for the circuit element (40.6 ml kg-1 min-1) and least for the side/supine element (20.0 ml kg-1 min-1). The differences in VO2 between the locomotrr and callisthenic elements were significant (circuit approximately jump approximately low impact > prone approximately side/supine). However, effect size data suggested that the differences between the low impact and jump elements and the prone and side/supine elements were of practical significance (circuit approximately jump > low impact > prone > side/supine). With a single exception similar parametric statistics and effect size trends were identified for absolute heart rate. Specifically, the heart rate associated with the low impact element was not significantly greater than the prone element. The oxygen pulse associated with the locomotor elements was significantly greater than the callisthenic elements (circuit approximately jump approximately low impact > prone > side/supine). This suggested that heart rate may be an inappropriate index for making comparisons between exercise-to-music elements. Reasons for differences in oxygen uptake values between movement elements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044493      PMCID: PMC1332157          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.28.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  5 in total

1.  What is missing in p less than .05? Effect size.

Authors:  J R Thomas; W Salazar; D M Landers
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Aerobic dance. A review.

Authors:  J G Garrick; R K Requa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Energy cost of bench stepping and pumping light handweights in trained subjects.

Authors:  F L Goss; R J Robertson; R J Spina; T E Auble; D A Cassinelli; R M Silberman; R W Galbreath; K F Metz
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  The effects of aerobic dance training on serum lipids, lipoproteins and cardiopulmonary function.

Authors:  H N Williford; D L Blessing; J M Barksdale; F H Smith
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand on the prevention of thermal injuries during distance running.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.