Literature DB >> 8044228

A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment.

J Nethercott1, D Paustenbach, R Adams, J Fowler, J Marks, C Morton, J Taylor, S Horowitz, B Finley.   

Abstract

Over the past 60 years, dose-response patch test studies by various methods have been conducted in an attempt to identify the minimum elicitation threshold (MET) concentration of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) that produces an allergic response in Cr(VI) sensitive subjects. These data are not adequate, however, to provide an accurate estimate of the MET because of the variability in the patch testing techniques and the variability in diagnostic criteria used. Furthermore, the data were not reported in terms of mass of allergen per surface area of skin (mg Cr/cm2-skin), which is necessary for conducting occupational or environmental health risk assessments. Thus the purpose of this study was to determine the MET (mg allergen/cm2) for Cr(VI) and trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) by patch testing techniques. A patch test method that delivers a controlled amount of allergen per surface area of skin was used. A group of 54 Cr(VI) sensitised volunteers were patch tested with serial dilutions of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) to determine the cumulative response rate at several concentrations. The results indicate that the 10% MET for Cr(VI) based on the cumulative response was 0.089 micrograms Cr(VI)/cm2-skin. Only one of the 54 volunteers may have responded to 33 micrograms Cr(III)/cm2-skin, otherwise Cr(III) was unable to produce allergic contact dermatitis in these highly sensitive volunteers. Two supplemental studies were also conducted to assess whether the surface area of the patch and the concentration of Cr(VI) in the patch (related to patch thickness) were likely to influence the results. The data from these studies were used to assess the risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis due to contact with Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in soil. The findings indicated that soil concentrations at least as high as 450 ppm Cr(VI) and 165,000 ppm Cr(III) should not pose an allergic contact dermatitis hazard for at least 99.99% of the people in the community who might be exposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044228      PMCID: PMC1127992          DOI: 10.1136/oem.51.6.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  36 in total

Review 1.  Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization in contact dermatitis.

Authors:  M R Upadhye; H I Maibach
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Patch tests with occupational contactants in nurses, doctors and dentists.

Authors:  E Rudzki; P Rebandel; Z Grzywa
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Evaluation of contact dermatitis using the TRUE patch test.

Authors:  R W Wright
Journal:  J Ark Med Soc       Date:  1991-11

4.  Preliminary studies of the TRUE test patch test system in the United States. TRUE Test Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Patch testing with potassium dichromate in different vehicles.

Authors:  E Skog; J E Wahlberg
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1969-06

6.  Chromium in US household bleach.

Authors:  J J Hostynek; H I Maibach
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  [On the relationship between chromate and dichromate allergy. Contribution to the analysis of chromium(VI) allergy].

Authors:  J Zelger; H Wachter
Journal:  Dermatologica       Date:  1966

8.  An assessment and quantitative uncertainty analysis of the health risks to workers exposed to chromium contaminated soils.

Authors:  D J Paustenbach; D M Meyer; P J Sheehan; V Lau
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 9.  A proposed approach to regulating contaminated soil: identify safe concentrations for seven of the most frequently encountered exposure scenarios.

Authors:  D J Paustenbach; J D Jernigan; R Bass; R Kalmes; P Scott
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  A survey of skin disorders seen in pediatric general and dermatology clinics.

Authors:  W W Tunnessen
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  5 in total

1.  A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  A H Stern; R E Hazen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  The effects of chromium(VI) on the thioredoxin system: implications for redox regulation.

Authors:  Charles R Myers
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Chromium released from leather - I: exposure conditions that govern the release of chromium(III) and chromium(VI).

Authors:  Yolanda S Hedberg; Carola Lidén; Inger Odnevall Wallinder
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Chromium(III) release from chromium-tanned leather elicits allergic contact dermatitis: a use test study.

Authors:  Yolanda S Hedberg; Behnaz Erfani; Mihály Matura; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  The Toxicological Risk Assessment of Dermal Exposure of Patients Exposed to Nickel and Chromium due to Application of Ointments with Marjoram Herb Extract (Majoranae Herbae Extractum) Available in Polish Pharmacies.

Authors:  Kamil Jurowski; Maria Fołta; Barbara Tatar; Mehmet Berkoz; Mirosław Krośniak
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.