Literature DB >> 8044219

Collaborative benchmarking in health care.

D Mosel1, B Gift.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A collaborative approach to traditional benchmarking involves the formation of a voluntary network of health care providers that cooperate in carrying out the benchmarking study. THE COLLABORATIVE APPROACH: Collaborative benchmarking involves three phases: Select the benchmarking topic. Decision makers at the sponsoring organization select the benchmarking topic. Establish the benchmarking collaborative. Potential participant organizations are identified and encouraged to join the collaborative. Once the collaborative is formed, project stakeholders are identified, a charter for the study is created, and the project steering committee is established. Conduct the study. A combination of internal and external benchmarking can be used, first conducting the project within the collaborative, then repeating the study either within the industry or across industries. Regardless of the benchmarking type selected, the process follows the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. An example of a health care system that is benchmarking the workers' compensation process is used to illustrate the three phases of collaborative benchmarking. A second example, which describes a benchmarking project focused on the admissions process, illustrates the external benchmarking phase. PREREQUISITES AND ACCELERATORS: Four prerequisites for effective benchmarking are leadership commitment, experience with continuous quality improvement, preparation of the organization, and identification of key processes. Organizational capacity for learning, knowledge of the customer and process variation, resource availability, and leadership understanding of benchmarking may each accelerate, or retard, the effective use of collaborative benchmarking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044219     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30068-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  7 in total

1.  Exploring the Pathways Revealed by International Sepsis Benchmarking.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Development of a tool for benchmarking of clinical pharmacy activities.

Authors:  Marine Cillis; Anne Spinewine; Bruno Krug; Stéfanie Quennery; Dominique Wouters; Olivia Dalleur
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres.

Authors:  Wineke A M van Lent; Relinde D de Beer; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Measuring case severity: a novel tool for benchmarking and clinical documentation improvement.

Authors:  Jie Xiang; Paul W Durance; Louisa C Griffes; Yalei Chen; Rishi R Bakshi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Exploring improvements in patient logistics in Dutch hospitals with a survey.

Authors:  Wineke A M van Lent; E Marloes Sanders; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Implementing large scale fast track diagnostics in a comprehensive cancer center, pre- and post-measurement data.

Authors:  W H van Harten; N Goedbloed; A H Boekhout; S Heintzbergen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Claire Willmington; Paolo Belardi; Anna Maria Murante; Milena Vainieri
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.