Literature DB >> 8043556

Assessment of medical treatments for menorrhagia.

R W Shaw1.   

Abstract

Although usually not life-threatening, dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) can cause discomfort and disruption to life for many women. It has been poorly researched in the past, primarily because of difficulties in trying to accurately measure blood loss and response to treatment. There are several different therapies currently available but, for many, actual evidence of their efficacy is lacking from scientific data. Progestogens are the most frequently prescribed drugs for the treatment of DUB. Data support their use in anovulatory women but a number of comparative trials have shown that an overall reduction in blood loss of only 20% is achieved in ovulatory women. Their use, therefore, must be questioned as the first line of treatment. Combined oral contraceptives were at one time popular but whether the low-dose, current generation pills are equally effective awaits appropriate trials. Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors can be useful, with up to a third of women with menorrhagia benefiting from a reduction of between 25% and 35% in blood loss. A proportionally greater reduction is seen in women with more excessive bleeding. Antifibrinolytic drugs have been shown to reduce menstrual blood loss in DUB by 50% and would be useful in women in whom oestrogens are contraindicated. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues are highly effective because of their ability to induce amenorrhoea, but long-term use is contraindicated because of their hypo-oestrogenic effects. One other effective therapy for menorrhagia has been danazol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8043556     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13690.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  6 in total

1.  Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy.

Authors:  P Lähteenmäki; M Haukkamaa; J Puolakka; U Riikonen; S Sainio; J Suvisaari; C G Nilsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

Review 2.  Benefits and risks of pharmacological agents used for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Authors:  Samendra Nath Roy; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Danazol for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  H Beaumont; C Augood; K Duckitt; A Lethaby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

4.  Are women satisfied when using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding?

Authors:  Nina Mansukhani; Jyothi Unni; Meenakshi Dua; Reeta Darbari; Sonia Malik; Sohani Verma; Sonal Bathla
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2013-01

5.  Medical therapy versus radiofrequency endometrial ablation in the initial treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (iTOM Trial): A clinical and economic analysis.

Authors:  Abimbola O Famuyide; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Sherif A Shazly; Kirsten Hall Long; Daniel M Breitkopf; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Sherif A El-Nashar; Maureen A Lemens; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) versus endometrial ablation (Novasure) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Malou C Herman; Marian J van den Brink; Peggy M Geomini; Hannah S van Meurs; Judith A Huirne; Heleen P Eising; Anne Timmermans; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Ellen R Klinkert; Sjors F Coppus; Theodoor E Nieboer; Ruby Catshoek; Lucet F van der Voet; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven; Giuseppe C M Graziosi; Sebastiaan Veersema; Paul J van Kesteren; Josje Langenveld; Nicol A C Smeets; Huib A A M van Vliet; Jan Willem van der Steeg; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Janny H Dekker; Ben W Mol; Marjolein Y Berger; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.