Literature DB >> 8043099

Estimating time of delivery.

S Rowlands, P Royston.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8043099      PMCID： PMC1238852     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Benefits of ultrasonic screening of a pregnant population.

Authors:  L Grennert; P H Persson; G Gennser
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1978

2.  Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment.

Authors:  R T Geirsson
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor.

Authors:  U Waldenström; O Axelsson; S Nilsson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle.

Authors:  L Chiazze; F T Brayer; J J Macisco; M P Parker; B J Duffy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?

Authors:  S Rowlands; P Royston
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures.

Authors:  H C Bucher; J G Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

7.  Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age.

Authors:  S Campbell; S L Warsof; D Little; D J Cooper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.661
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.