Literature DB >> 8042821

Preserving renal function in patients with membranous nephropathy: daily oral chlorambucil compared with intermittent monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide.

L J Reichert1, F T Huysmans, K Assmann, R A Koene, J F Wetzels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare oral chlorambucil and intravenous cyclophosphamide-based drug regimens in the treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy and deteriorating renal function.
DESIGN: Randomized study.
SETTING: University hospital and teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: 18 patients with membranous nephropathy, a nephrotic syndrome, and deteriorating renal function. INTERVENTION: Chlorambucil (0.15 mg/kg body weight per day orally in months 2, 4, and 6) and prednisone (three intravenous pulses of 1 g of methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg per day in months 1, 3, and 5) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 body surface area once every month for 6 months) and methylprednisolone (three intravenous 1-g pulses in months 1, 3, and 5). MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine, serum cholesterol, serum albumin, and urinary protein levels.
RESULTS: Before treatment, no statistical differences were found between the treatment groups. Six months after treatment was started, serum creatinine levels had decreased in the group treated with chlorambucil, methylprednisolone, and prednisone from a mean of 260 +/- 112 mumol/L to 186 +/- 74 mumol/L (P = 0.003) and had increased in the group treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone from 218 +/- 85 mumol/L to 297 +/- 143 mumol/L (P = 0.02; difference between both groups, P < 0.001). Serum albumin levels increased in both groups by 9 and 6 g/L, respectively, and the urinary protein/creatinine ratio decreased by 2.6 and 3.1 g/10 mmol, respectively. At the end of follow-up (median, 15 months; range, 6 to 36 months), one patient in the chlorambucil group and four patients in the cyclophosphamide group had reached end-stage renal failure after 36, 12, 12, 18, and 18 months of therapy, respectively. One patient in the intravenous cyclophosphamide group died after 6 months of therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus far, both oral chlorambucil and oral cyclophosphamide have been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy and deteriorating renal function. Our study shows that intermittent monthly pulses of low-dose cyclophosphamide are ineffective in preserving renal function in such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8042821     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-5-199409010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

Review 1.  Medical decision-making in membranous nephropathy: how to use limited clinical research evidence in patient management.

Authors:  Hirokazu Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Thilo C von Groote; Gabrielle Williams; Eric H Au; Yizhi Chen; Anna T Mathew; Elisabeth M Hodson; David J Tunnicliffe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-15

3.  Substitution of Oral for Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Leonella Luzardo; Gabriela Ottati; Jimena Cabrera; Hernando Trujillo; Mariela Garau; Carlota González Bedat; Ruben Coitiño; María H Aunchayna; José Santiago; Graciela Baldovinos; Ricardo Silvariño; Alejandro Ferreiro; Francisco González-Martínez; Liliana Gadola; Oscar Noboa; Hena Caorsi
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-08-07

Review 4.  Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Authors:  Yizhi Chen; Arrigo Schieppati; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen; Javier Zamora; Giovanni A Giuliano; Norbert Braun; Annalisa Perna
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Controversies in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Meryl Waldman; Howard A Austin
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 6.  Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: management strategies.

Authors:  Marco Quaglia; Piero Stratta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Immunosuppression therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bhadran Bose; Edmund Y M Chung; Regina Hong; Giovanni F M Strippoli; David W Johnson; Wen-Ling Yang; Sunil V Badve; Suetonia C Palmer
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.393

8.  Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2012-06

9.  Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Song Ren; Ying Wang; Li Xian; Tadashi Toyama; Meg Jardine; Guisen Li; Vlado Perkovic; Daqing Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Vinod Mathrani; Abdulfattah Alejmi; Siân Griffin; Gareth Roberts
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.