Literature DB >> 8040111

Comparative in-vitro activity of biapenem against enterobacteria with beta-lactamase-mediated antibiotic resistance.

H Y Chen1, D M Livermore.   

Abstract

The effects of enterobacterial beta-lactamases were studied for biapenem (L627), a new carbapenem. Susceptibility tests were performed for isogenic mutant series of Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris which varied only in chromosomal beta-lactamase expression. beta-Lactamase-derepressed organisms in these series were as susceptible as beta-lactamase-inducible strains to biapenem; beta-lactamase-basal mutants were up to eight-fold more susceptible. Similar patterns of relative activity against the different expression types were noted for imipenem and biapenem. These data were related to direct induction and hydrolysis assays: biapenem, like imipenem, was a strong inducer of several Class I enzymes and of the P. vulgaris cefuroximase and, like the other carbapenems, was only very slowly hydrolysed by these enzymes. Moreover, like meropenem, biapenem reversibly deactivated these beta-lactamases. Piperacillin and the cephalosporins, tested as comparators, were more labile than carbapenems to the Class I enzymes, were weak inducers below their MICs and lacked deactivator function. In consequence their MICs were higher for derepressed organisms than for those with inducible or basal beta-lactamase expression. Unlike the carbapenems, they selected derepressed mutants from inducible populations. Biapenem, like imipenem and meropenem, retained full activity against most transconjugants of Escherichia coli K-12 that produced plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, including extended-spectrum TEM mutants. Only production of OXA-10 (previously PSE-2) enzyme gave a slight reduction in susceptibility to the new carbapenem. Biapenem resistance (MIC 16 mg/L) did, however, occur in S. marcescens S6, which produced a chromosomal carbapenemase. This enzyme hydrolysed biapenem. Overall, our findings indicate that biapenem shares the favourable properties of imipenem and meropenem in its interactions with the most important beta-lactamases of enterobacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8040111     DOI: 10.1093/jac/33.3.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  5 in total

1.  Interactions of beta-lactamases with sanfetrinem (GV 104326) compared to those with imipenem and with oral beta-lactams.

Authors:  G S Babini; M Yuan; D M Livermore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Biapenem.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry; Tim Ibbotson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; A J Wagstaff; R N Brogden; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  New treatment options against gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Francesca Ginocchio; Malgorzata Mikulska
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.