Literature DB >> 8038850

A Delphi study on research priorities for trauma nursing.

E W Bayley1, T Richmond, E L Noroian, L R Allen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize research questions of importance to trauma patient care and of interest to trauma nurses.
METHOD: A three-round Delphi technique was used to solicit, identify, and prioritize problems for trauma nursing research. In round 1, experienced trauma nurses (N = 208) generated 513 problems, which were analyzed, categorized, and collapsed into 111 items for subsequent rounds. Round 2 participants rated each research question on a 1 to 7 scale on two criteria: impact on patient welfare and value for practicing nurses. Group median scores provided by 166 round 2 respondents and respondents' individual round 2 scores were indicated on the round 3 questionnaire. Subjects rated the questions again on the same criteria and indicated whether nurses, independently or in collaboration with other health professionals, should assume responsibility for that research. Median and mean scores and rank order were determined for each item.
RESULTS: Respondents who completed all three rounds (n = 137) had a mean of 8.3 years of trauma experience. Nine research questions ranked within the top 20 on both criteria. The two research questions that ranked highest on both criteria were: What are the most effective nursing interventions in the prevention of pulmonary and circulatory complications in trauma patients? and What are the most effective methods for preventing aspiration in trauma patients during the postoperative phase? The third-ranked question regarding patient welfare was: What psychological and lifestyle changes result from traumatic injury? Regarding value for practicing nurses, What are the most effective educational methods to prepare and maintain proficiency in trauma care providers? ranked third.
CONCLUSION: These research priorities provide impetus and direction for nursing and collaborative investigation in trauma care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  5 in total

Review 1.  Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Colin Sanderson; Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-17

2.  Consensus development for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Bory Kea; Benjamin Chih-An Sun
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  The management of children with bronchiolitis in the Australasian hospital setting: development of a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Sharon O'Brien; Sally Wilson; Fenella J Gill; Elizabeth Cotterell; Meredith L Borland; Edward Oakley; Stuart R Dalziel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services.

Authors:  Glenn Robert; Jenny Harlock; Iestyn Williams
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Modified international e-Delphi survey to define healthcare professional competencies for working with teenagers and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Rachel M Taylor; Richard G Feltbower; Natasha Aslam; Rosalind Raine; Jeremy S Whelan; Faith Gibson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.