Literature DB >> 8038680

Where have all the pennies gone? The work of Manchester Medical Audit Advisory Group.

R Johnson1.   

Abstract

Medical audit has its critics, who point to the large sums of NHS cash that seem to be disappearing down a medical plughole. These criticisms are recognised by medical audit advisory groups but there are many reasons why the work of these groups has not yet resulted in many publications in journals or bumped up health indicators. After discussing the criticism this article describes the work of the medical audit advisory group in Manchester. Real changes in cooperative working with general practice teams and between practices are taking place, and improved relationships between general practice and the hospitals are being helped by joint audit work. The Manchester group is also working to help in setting standards and to cooperate with purchasing. The work of the group is changing as it develops.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038680      PMCID: PMC2540543          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  4 in total

1.  Developing role of medical audit advisory groups.

Authors:  C Humphrey; D Berrow
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

2.  HA law.

Authors:  P Old
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1993-01-07

3.  Auditing audits: the method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group.

Authors:  J Derry; M Lawrence; K Griew; J Anderson; J Humphreys; K S Pandher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-16

4.  The effects of peer review in general practice.

Authors:  R Grol; H Mokkink; F Schellevis
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-01
  4 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.

Authors:  G Johnston; I K Crombie; H T Davies; E M Alder; A Millard
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement.

Authors:  M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24

3.  Is general practice audit alive and well? The view from Portsmouth.

Authors:  C Lewis; D Combes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.

Authors:  R Chambers; S Bowyer; I Campbell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

5.  Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.

Authors:  R Baker; N Robertson; A Farooqi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

6.  Medical audit advisory groups. More investment means better audit.

Authors:  G Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

7.  Medical audit advisory groups. Consider the number of practices.

Authors:  A J Howitt; C Varns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.