Literature DB >> 8038450

Treatment of ruminal indigestion according to popular belief in Sweden.

S Brag1, H J Hansen.   

Abstract

For hundreds of years, the Swedish peasantry were able to cure diseases of animals by using various popular remedies. In this context, ruminal indigestion is a disease of special interest to veterinary history. Long before research had demonstrated the importance for rumination of the ruminal microflora and microfauna, the Swedish peasantry used to administer living ruminal microorganisms from a healthy cow or sheep to an animal suffering from ruminal indigestion. This was performed by giving the diseased animal a cud obtained from the healthy animal. According to some beliefs, the cud was a living being. Those cherishing this belief therefore thought it wise to take only part of the cud so as not to harm the involuntary donor. Another common treatment of ruminal indigestion was based on the thought that the cow had lost the ability to chew. The authors describe the frequent use of chewing of various substances as a remedy. In the available literature, some forty different remedies have been described either alone or used in combination with the above principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038450     DOI: 10.20506/rst.13.2.782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  7 in total

1.  Natural remedies and nutraceuticals used in ethnoveterinary practices in inland southern Italy.

Authors:  A Pieroni; P Howard; G Volpato; R F Santoro
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Engineering the microbiome for animal health and conservation.

Authors:  Se Jin Song; Douglas C Woodhams; Cameron Martino; Celeste Allaband; Andre Mu; Sandrine Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery; Jan S Suchodolski; Rob Knight
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-02-18

3.  Circum-Mediterranean cultural heritage and medicinal plant uses in traditional animal healthcare: a field survey in eight selected areas within the RUBIA project.

Authors:  Andrea Pieroni; Maria Elena Giusti; Caterina de Pasquale; Cinzia Lenzarini; Eleonora Censorii; María Reyes Gonzáles-Tejero; Cristina Patricia Sánchez-Rojas; Jose M Ramiro-Gutiérrez; Melpomeni Skoula; Chris Johnson; Anaya Sarpaki; Athena Della; Demetra Paraskeva-Hadijchambi; Andreas Hadjichambis; Mohammed Hmamouchi; Said El-Jorhi; Mohamed El-Demerdash; Mustafa El-Zayat; Omar Al-Shahaby; Zahia Houmani; Mekious Scherazed
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  Commentary on key aspects of fecal microbiota transplantation in small animal practice.

Authors:  Jennifer Chaitman; Albert E Jergens; Frederic Gaschen; Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro; Stanley L Marks; Alicia G Marroquin-Cardona; Keith Richter; Giacomo Rossi; Jan S Suchodolski; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 5.  Fecal microbiota transplantation as a tool to treat and reduce susceptibility to disease in animals.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 6.  Utilizing the Gastrointestinal Microbiota to Modulate Cattle Health through the Microbiome-Gut-Organ Axes.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Valerie E Ryman; T Dean Pringle; Jeferson M Lourenco
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-10

Review 7.  Impacts of Gut Microbiota on the Immune System and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Re-Emerging Therapy for Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Ashenafi Feyisa Beyi; Michael Wannemuehler; Paul J Plummer
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.