Literature DB >> 8038342

Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. Description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures.

A Lie1, T Jemt.   

Abstract

A photogrammetric technique was designed to measure the position of dental implants in 3 dimensions to enable assessment of the fit of superstructures placed on the implants. A relatively simple camera set-up was developed and tested. Calibration of the camera was performed in a high-precision analytical plotter and revealed a film measurement accuracy of 0.005 mm. The achieved measuring accuracy for clear and well defined points on clinical components was found to be around 0.02 mm. To find the center points of the implants, points on the circumference were measured. These points are not well defined, which resulted in an estimation of the center point of the implant with a precision of 0.05 mm. Independent measurements of a prosthesis with 5 implants were also within the precision of 0.05 mm. The angular orientation of the top surface of the implant cylinder (abutment, brass replica of gold alloy cylinder of the framework) was measured with a precision of 0.01 radians, which corresponded to an error with a peripheral gap of about 0.03 mm. This value was about 5-10 times lower than the clinical fit between frameworks and abutments, measured in 3 randomly selected clinical cases.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038342     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Leticia Bagán; Beatriz Giménez; María Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-07-01

2.  Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Bowen Ma; Xinxin Yue; Yujie Sun; Lingyan Peng; Wei Geng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Digital Dental Models: Is Photogrammetry an Alternative to Dental Extraoral and Intraoral Scanners?

Authors:  Francesca Zotti; Luca Rosolin; Massimo Bersani; Andrea Poscolere; Davide Pappalardo; Nicoletta Zerman
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  A sectional-splinting technique for impressing multiple implant units by eliminating the use of an open tray.

Authors:  Suryakant C Deogade; Gunjan Dube
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04

5.  A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant master casts fabricated from two different transfer impression techniques.

Authors:  Rupali Patil; Pankaj Kadam; Chetan Oswal; Seema Patil; Shweta Jajoo; Arati Gachake
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.