Literature DB >> 8037938

Expanded Medicaid coverage for pregnant women to 100 percent of the federal poverty level.

J M Piper1, E F Mitchel, W A Ray.   

Abstract

Our objective was (1) to identify the subgroup of women most affected by the regulatory change expanding Tennessee Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women from 45% of the federal poverty level to 100% and (2) to examine whether increased enrollment correlated with greater use of prenatal care and improved reproductive outcomes. We linked Tennessee birth and fetal death certificates to Medicaid enrollment files. We compare outcome rates in the 12-month period before the change in the Medicaid regulations with similar rates for the 10-month period after the change had been in effect nine months. We found the increase in Medicaid enrollment that occurred after the expansion was greatest for teenage mothers. Among teens, Medicaid enrollment increased 18%, and the odds of receiving no prenatal care or only late (third-trimester) care were reduced 16% (95% confidence interval = 8%, 24%) after we controlled for potential confounders. However, there was no improvement in first-trimester use of prenatal care or in birth outcomes. This finding suggests the need to evaluate carefully subsequent regulatory changes, which sought to promote early prenatal care by removing barriers to early Medicaid enrollment in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8037938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women.

Authors:  L Dubay; T Joyce; R Kaestner; G M Kenney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Increasing pregnancy-related use of prescribed opioid analgesics.

Authors:  Richard A Epstein; William V Bobo; Peter R Martin; James A Morrow; Wei Wang; Rameela Chandrasekhar; William O Cooper
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The effect of expansions in Medicaid income eligibility on abortion.

Authors:  T Joyce; R Kaestner
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1996-05

Review 5.  Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings.

Authors:  L Simpson; C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women.

Authors:  Susan Egerter; Paula Braveman; Kristen Marchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Racial differences in perceived barriers to prenatal care.

Authors:  S A Tossounian; K C Schoendorf; J L Kiely
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-12

8.  Use of high-technology care among women with high-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  R M Schwartz; J H Muri; M D Overpeck; J C Pezzullo; M D Kogan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-03

9.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

10.  Increasing use of atypical antipsychotics and anticonvulsants during pregnancy.

Authors:  Richard A Epstein; William V Bobo; Richard C Shelton; Patrick G Arbogast; James A Morrow; Wei Wang; Rameela Chandrasekhar; William O Cooper
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.