Literature DB >> 8037269

Comparison of lateral ankle ligamentous reconstruction procedures.

S H Liu1, C L Baker.   

Abstract

The static restraints of various surgical procedures for chronic lateral ankle instability were compared. Forty cadaveric ankles were divided equally into the following five groups: 1) ankles with intact anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, 2) ankles with incised anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, 3) ankles with Chrisman-Snook procedure, 4) ankles with Watson-Jones procedure, or 5) ankles with modified Broström procedure. All ankles were placed in a mechanical apparatus for anterior drawer stress and inversion stress tests. After each application of force, a radiograph of the ankle joint was taken, and the anterior talar displacement and the talar tilt angle were measured. All procedures reduced anterior drawer and talar tilt when compared with the ankles with incised anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments. Significant differences were found among the groups for both inversion and anterior drawer stress at all forces, except for the third and fourth groups. The modified Broström group had the least amount of anterior talar displacement and talar tilt angle at all forces. There were no significant differences between the Watson-Jones and the Chrisman-Snook procedures in anterior talar displacement and talar tilt. The modified Broström procedure produced a greater mechanical restraint than either of the other procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8037269     DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Delayed reconstruction of lateral complex structures of the ankle.

Authors:  Gordon L Slater; Alejandro E Pino; Martin O'Malley
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-04-18

Review 2.  [Treatment of lateral ankle joint instability. Open or arthroscopic?].

Authors:  M Galla
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Raymond J Walls; Keir A Ross; Ethan J Fraser; Christopher W Hodgkins; Niall A Smyth; Christopher J Egan; James Calder; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

4.  Changes in joint position sense after surgically treated chronic lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  T Halasi; A Kynsburg; A Tállay; I Berkes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Osteoarthritis Prevalence in Retired National Football League Players With a History of Ankle Injuries and Surgery.

Authors:  Kyeongtak Song; Erik A Wikstrom; Joshua N Tennant; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stephen W Marshall; Zachary Y Kerr
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Treatment algorithm for chronic lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Alberto Ruffilli; Gherardo Pagliazzi; Antonio Mazzotti; Giulia Evangelisti; Roberto Buda; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  Ankle Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Lateral Ligaments (Ankle Anti-ROLL).

Authors:  Masato Takao; Mark Glazebrook; James Stone; Stéphane Guillo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-10-23

8.  Treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability: a modified Broström technique using three suture anchors.

Authors:  Xinning Li; Timothy J Lin; Brian D Busconi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Surgical Considerations in the Treatment of Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Judith F Baumhauer; Todd O'Brien
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The effect of modified Broström-Gould repair for lateral ankle instability on in vivo tibiotalar kinematics.

Authors:  William B Wainright; Charles E Spritzer; Jun Young Lee; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.