Literature DB >> 8036094

Discriminability of electrocutaneous stimuli after topical anesthesia: detection-theory measurement of sensitivity to painful stimuli.

R J Irwin1, M J Hautus, N J Dawson, D Welch, M F Bayly.   

Abstract

In three experiments on the psychophysical measurement of pain, electrocutaneous currents were applied to the volar surface of the forearm. In the first experiment, a conventional category scaling method was compared with the rating method of signal detection. The results of both methods were analyzed in detection-theory terms to derive receiver operating characteristic curves and measures of the discriminability of adjacent currents. The rating method yielded larger discriminability values than the category scale did, and that method was therefore used in the subsequent experiments to examine the effect of a topical anesthetic on discriminability. When the stimuli were applied through surface electrodes, no effect of the topical anesthetic on discriminability was found, but when the stimuli were applied to a more localized area by intradermal needle electrodes, a dose-dependent effect of the anesthetic on discriminability occurred. For this experiment, the slope of the cumulative sensitivity function increased with increasing elapsed time since the removal of the anesthetic. This result is congruent with the theory that discriminability can serve as a measure of sensitivity to painful stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8036094     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Detection and decision factors in pain perception in young and elderly men.

Authors:  S W Harkins; C R Chapman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The psychophysics of categorical perception.

Authors:  N A Macmillan; H L Kaplan; C D Creelman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The detectability, discriminability, and perceived magnitude of painful electrical shock.

Authors:  G B Rollman; G Harris
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

Review 4.  Signal detection theory measurement of pain: a review and critique.

Authors:  Gary B Rollman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A multiple random staircase method of psychophysical pain assessment.

Authors:  R H Gracely; L Lota; D J Walter; R Dubner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Where is the noise in SDT pain assessment?

Authors:  R Coppola; R H Gracely
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  An ROC analysis of pain reactions in dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women.

Authors:  P Goolkasian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

9.  Topical anaesthesia with EMLA, a new lidocaine-prilocaine cream and the Cusum technique for detection of minimal application time.

Authors:  G Ehrenström-Reiz; S Reiz; O Stockman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using magnitude estimation to investigate the perceptual components of signal detection theory.

Authors:  D J Cohen; L Lecci
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.