Literature DB >> 8035694

What effect can rhythmic finger tapping have on the phonological similarity effect?

S Saito1.   

Abstract

The effects of rhythmic finger tapping on the phonological similarity effect were investigated in two experiments. In both, subjects were tested for serial recall of visually presented letter sequences that were either phonologically similar or dissimilar. The letter sequences had to be remembered under three tapping conditions: right-hand tapping, left-hand tapping, and a no-tapping control. Experiment 1 showed clear phonological similarity effect in both the control and the left-hand tapping conditions, but not in the right-hand tapping condition, when recall responses were written with the right hand. When the number of tapping practice trials was fixed at two and recall was vocal in Experiment 2, the phonological similarity effect was eliminated in both the right-hand and the left-hand tapping conditions. These results suggest that some form of speech motor programs played an important role in serial recall.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8035694     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN.

Authors:  R CONRAD; A J HULL
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1964-11

2.  [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].

Authors:  S Saito
Journal:  Shinrigaku Kenkyu       Date:  1993-10

3.  Effects of subvocal suppression, articulating aloud and noise on sequence recall.

Authors:  J Wilding; N Mohindra
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1980-05

4.  Effects of concurrent hemisphere-specific activity on unimanual tapping rate.

Authors:  J B Hellige; L E Longstreth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  The role of working memory in spatial enumeration: patterns of selective interference in subitizing and counting.

Authors:  Lana M Trick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

2.  Are there age differences in the executive component of working memory? Evidence from domain-general interference effects.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Joel Myerson; Mitchell S Sommers; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-04-28

3.  Short-term memory loss over time without retroactive stimulus interference.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Angela M AuBuchon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  Slave systems in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters; David Howard
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Domain-Generality of Timing-Based Serial Order Processes in Short-Term Memory: New Insights from Musical and Verbal Domains.

Authors:  Simon Gorin; Benjamin Kowialiewski; Steve Majerus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Separability of active semantic and phonological maintenance in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Ryoji Nishiyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Working memory for pitch, timbre, and words.

Authors:  Katrin Schulze; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.