Literature DB >> 8034237

Lack of anti-factor Xa activity in umbilical cord vein samples after subcutaneous administration of heparin or low molecular mass heparin in pregnant women.

J Harenberg1, D Schneider, L Heilmann, H Wolf.   

Abstract

Prophylaxis of thromboembolism with low molecular mass (LMM) heparin may offer several advantages over conventional heparin during pregnancy. Heparin-related side effects as osteoporosis, local allergy, thrombocytopenia and increase in liver enzymes may occur less frequently with LMM heparin. However, LMM heparins of different origins have to be considered as individual pharmaceutical compounds. This is of special clinical importance regarding a possible placental passage. We performed a randomized controlled study comparing the anti-factor Xa activities in plasma samples of 60 pregnant women undergoing delivery at term and in the umbilical cord vein of the newborn after subcutaneous administration of 5,000 IU unfractionated (UF) heparin or 1,500 activated partial thromboplastin time units LMM heparin or placebo. Injections were performed about 2 h prior to the delivery. Maternal and fetal blood samples were taken at the same time to assay heparin activity by the heptest coagulation assay and the S2222 chromogenic substrate method. LMM heparin was detected in all maternal plasma samples whereas UF heparin was measurable only in about one third of them. UF heparin as well as LMM heparin were not detectable in samples taken from the umbilical cord vein. The data demonstrate that neither UF nor the LMM heparin used in this study cross the placenta in relevant inhibitory activity towards factor Xa. This finding is in accordance with the previous experiences regarding the safe administration of other LMM heparins for prophylaxis of thromboembolism during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8034237     DOI: 10.1159/000216894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemostasis        ISSN: 0301-0147


  9 in total

Review 1.  Thrombophilia and its treatment in pregnancy.

Authors:  A Eldor
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Low molecular weight heparins: a guide to their optimum use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Pierre Laurent; Guy-Vincent Dussarat; Jacques Bonal; Christophe Jego; Philippe Talard; Christian Bouchiat; Gilles Cellarier
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  [Anticoagulation of pregnant women with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis].

Authors:  E Lindhoff-Last; H Schinzel; M Erbe; V Schächinger; R Bauersachs
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Sarina van der Zee; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period.

Authors:  Rebecca Tooher; Simon Gates; Therese Dowswell; Lucy-Jane Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

6.  Tinzaparin safety and efficacy in pregnancy.

Authors:  A Khalifeh; J Grantham; J Byrne; K Murphy; F McAuliffe; B Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Severe venous thromboembolism in the puerperal period caused by thrombosis: A case report.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Jing-Li Sun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 9.  Thrombophilia and pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael J Kupferminc
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.211

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.