Literature DB >> 8033847

Formate in serum and urine after controlled methanol exposure at the threshold limit value.

A d'Alessandro1, J D Osterloh, P Chuwers, P J Quinlan, T J Kelly, C E Becker.   

Abstract

Methanol will be present as a new air pollutant when methanol-powered vehicles are introduced in the United States. Little is known about the effect of low-dose methanol exposure. It is controversial whether or not formate, the main metabolite responsible for methanol's acute toxicity, is a sensitive biological marker of toxicity or exposure. We studied the effect of a 4-hr exposure at rest to 200 ppm of methanol vapors on endogenous serum formate and on urinary formic acid excretion. A randomized, double-blind study of human exposure to a constant concentration of methanol was performed in a whole-body exposure chamber. Twenty-six healthy volunteers, each serving as his or her own control, participated in sham and methanol exposures. Urine (at 0, 4, 8 hr) and serum specimens (15 time points over 8 hr) collected before, during, and after the exposure were measured for formate. We found no significant differences in serum formate concentration between exposure and control conditions either at any time point or for area under the curve. Mean concentrations at the end of the exposure were: exposed 14.28 +/- 8.90 mg/l and control 12.68 +/- 6.43 mg/l. A slight, but nonsignificant (p = 0.08), increase in urine formate excretion rate was found at 4 hr (exposed 2.17 +/- 1.69 mg/4 hr and control 1.67 +/- 1.02 mg/4 hr). Age, sex, folic acid level, and smoking were not significant covariates. At 200 ppm, methanol exposure does not contribute substantially to endogenous formate quantities. Serum and urine formate determinations are not sensitive biological markers of methanol exposure at the threshold limit value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8033847      PMCID: PMC1567213          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  20 in total

1.  A study of the conditions under which methanol may exert a toxic hazard in industry.

Authors:  G LEAF; L J ZATMAN
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1952-01

2.  Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. VI. Formic acid concentration in blood and urine as an indicator of methanol exposure.

Authors:  K Baumann; J Angerer
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1979-01-15       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Biological monitoring of persons exposed to methanol vapours.

Authors:  V Sedivec; M Mráz; J Flek
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. X. Biological monitoring parameters for methanol exposure.

Authors:  R Heinrich; J Angerer
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Formate in urine as a biological indicator of formaldehyde exposure: a review.

Authors:  M F Boeniger
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1987-11

6.  Methanol monitoring. Comparison of urinary methanol concentration with formic acid excretion rate as a measure of occupational exposure.

Authors:  D G Ferry; W A Temple; E G McQueen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Serum formate concentrations in methanol intoxication as a criterion for hemodialysis.

Authors:  J D Osterloh; S M Pond; S Grady; C E Becker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Methanol poisoning in human subjects. Role for formic acid accumulation in the metabolic acidosis.

Authors:  K E McMartin; J J Ambre; T R Tephly
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Urinary formic acid as an indicator of occupational exposure to formic acid and methanol.

Authors:  J Liesivuori; H Savolainen
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1987-01

10.  Studies on the role of folic acid and folate-dependent enzymes in human methanol poisoning.

Authors:  F C Johlin; C S Fortman; D D Nghiem; T R Tephly
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Fumaric Acid and Maleic Acid as Internal Standards for NMR Analysis of Protein Precipitated Plasma, Serum, and Whole Blood.

Authors:  G A Nagana Gowda; Natalie N Hong; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Potential health effects of gasoline and its constituents: A review of current literature (1990-1997) on toxicological data.

Authors:  L Caprino; G I Togna
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Metabolic Profiles of Propofol and Fospropofol: Clinical and Forensic Interpretative Aspects.

Authors:  Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Measurement of Methanol and Ethanol Contents in Most Commonly Used Herbal Distillates Produced by Three Famous Brands.

Authors:  Mahdi Yousefi; Reza Afshari; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Roshanak Salari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.429

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.