Literature DB >> 8032869

The neurology of kinetic art.

S Zeki1, M Lamb.   

Abstract

All visual art must obey the laws of the visual system. The first law is that an image of the visual world is not impressed upon the retina, but assembled together in the visual cortex. Consequently, many of the visual phenomena traditionally attributed to the eye actually occur in the cortex. Among these is visual motion. The second law is that of the functional specialization of the visual cortex, by which we mean that separate attributes of the visual scene are processed in geographically separate parts of the visual cortex, before being combined to give a unified and coherent picture of the visual world. The third law is that the attributes that are separated, and separately processed, in the cerebral cortex are those which have primacy in vision. These are colour, form, motion and, possibly, depth. It follows that motion is an autonomous visual attribute, separately processed and therefore capable of being separately compromised after brain lesions. It is also one of the visual attributes that have primacy, just like form or colour or depth. We conclude that it is this separate visual attribute which those involved in kinetic art have tried to exploit, instinctively and physiologically, from which it follows that in their explorations artists are unknowingly exploring the organization of the visual brain though with techniques unique to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032869     DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.3.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  11 in total

1.  Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; C Urgesi; G Orgs; S M Aglioti; P Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  L Cipolotti; E K Warrington
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  The role of expertise and culture in visual art appreciation.

Authors:  Kohinoor M Darda; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  How do we see art: an eye-tracker study.

Authors:  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Carlos Pedreira
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Corticomotor Excitability during Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art.

Authors:  Fortunato Battaglia; Sarah H Lisanby; David Freedberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Artistic explorations of the brain.

Authors:  Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A brain-derived metric for preferred kinetic stimuli.

Authors:  Semir Zeki; Jonathan Stutters
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.411

8.  Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Ausilio; Leonardo Badino; Yi Li; Sera Tokay; Laila Craighero; Rosario Canto; Yiannis Aloimonos; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dreaming and Neuroesthetics.

Authors:  Umberto Barcaro; Marco Paoli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance.

Authors:  Louise P Kirsch; Kim A Drommelschmidt; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.