Literature DB >> 803271

Effect of chloramphenicol on replication of mitochondria in Tetrahymena.

F K Gleason, M P Ooka, W P Cunningham, A B Hooper.   

Abstract

Tetrahymena pyriformis ST (3 X 10-4 cells/ml) was treated with 0.1 mg/ml chloramphenicol (CAP). Cell division ceased after 1.5 divisions with no decreased viability. Total mitochondrial volume and succinic dehydrogenase (SDH) activity/liter increased 1.7-fold and 3-fold, respectively. SDH activity/cell decreased whereas malate dehydrogenase activity/cell and respiratory control ratios and P:O ratios of isolated mitochondria were unchanged in treated cells. During 12 hours of growth in CAP the total surface area of mitochondrial inner and outer membrane was essentially unchanged or increased 4-fold, respectively. Mitochondria from cells treated with chloramphenicol had decreased size, buoyant density and protein:lipid ratio in the membranes. The membrane ubiquinone:protein ratio was unchanged. Tetrahymena cells contained 3.6 X 10-minus 12 g of mitochondrial DNA and 6,800 mitochondria in a volume of 41,000 mu-3. A 4-hour treatment with CAP caused a 4-fold increase in the number of mitochondria/cell and a 10-fold increase in mitochondria/liter in contrast to a 4-fold increase in number of mitochondria/liter in control cells. Thus CAP stimulated division of mitochondria. Individual mitochondria of treated cells had one-tenth the volume of control mitochondria. The rate of increase of mitochondrial DNA/liter was the same in control and CAP-treated cultures. The amount of DNA/mitochondrion decreased 75% in CAP-treated cells due to the rapid division of mitochondria. The cell volume, cell protein content and mitochondrial DNA content/cell decreased with growth of control cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 803271     DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1040850108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  5 in total

1.  Reply to Lane and Martin: Mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Georgi K Marinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The reversibility of the ethidium bromide-induced alterations of mitochondrial structure and function in the cellular slime mold, Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  L Kobilinsky; D S Beattie
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Mitochondrial volume fraction and translation duration impact mitochondrial mRNA localization and protein synthesis.

Authors:  Tatsuhisa Tsuboi; Matheus P Viana; Fan Xu; Jingwen Yu; Raghav Chanchani; Ximena G Arceo; Evelina Tutucci; Joonhyuk Choi; Yang S Chen; Robert H Singer; Susanne M Rafelski; Brian M Zid
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Dependence of nucleus-directed rRNA synthesis upon mitochondrial protein synthesis in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  L Ruben; A B Hooper
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Membranes, energetics, and evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Georgi K Marinov
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.