Literature DB >> 8030631

Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster.

A Donner1, N Klar.   

Abstract

The aim of many research investigations is to compare the proportion of individuals in each of several groups that have a certain characteristic. The unit of allocation for such investigations is often an intact social unit, as in randomizing families, medical practices, schools, or entire communities, to different intervention groups. Standard statistical methods are not appropriate for these designs, since they do not take into account the dependencies among individuals within the same cluster. The authors review the strengths and weaknesses of several approaches for dealing with this problem, using data from a school-based smoking cessation trial. A principal conclusion is that the choice of method should depend on whether or not random allocation is used in the assignment of interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8030631     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  61 in total

1.  An evidence-based programme for smoking cessation: effectiveness in routine general practice.

Authors:  G Grandes; J M Cortada; A Arrazola
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Smoking cessation at the workplace. Results of a randomised controlled intervention study. Worksite physicians from the AIREL group.

Authors:  T Lang; V Nicaud; K Slama; A Hirsch; E Imbernon; M Goldberg; L Calvel; P Desobry; J P Favre-Trosson; C Lhopital; P Mathevon; D Miara; A Miliani; F Panthier; G Pons; C Roitg; M Thoores
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Worksite health promotion using individual counselling and the effectiveness on sick leave; results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K I Proper; A J van der Beek; V H Hildebrandt; J W R Twisk; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The cluster-randomized Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer trial: evaluating a quality-improvement strategy in surgery.

Authors:  Marko Simunovic; Angela Coates; Charles H Goldsmith; Lehana Thabane; Dana Reeson; Andrew Smith; Robin S McLeod; Franco DeNardi; Timothy J Whelan; Mark N Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Evaluation of a bicycle skills training program for young children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Macarthur; P C Parkin; M Sidky; W Wallace
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 7.  Randomised trials of STD treatment for HIV prevention: report of an international workshop. HIV/STD Trials Workshop Group.

Authors:  R Hayes; M Wawer; R Gray; J Whitworth; H Grosskurth; D Mabey
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

8.  Patient satisfaction with GP-led melanoma follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Murchie; M C Nicolson; P C Hannaford; E A Raja; A J Lee; N C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Dermatological reactions to the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib.

Authors:  S E Rosenbaum; S Wu; M A Newman; D P West; T Kuzel; M E Lacouture
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT).

Authors:  Claudio M Martin; Gordon S Doig; Daren K Heyland; Teresa Morrison; William J Sibbald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.