Literature DB >> 8029242

Sib competition and sperm competitiveness: an answer to 'why so many sperms?' and the recombination/sperm number correlation.

J T Manning1, A T Chamberlain.   

Abstract

Sperm, or inter-ejaculate, competition leads to the evolution of many sperm per ejaculate. However, sperm competition theory does not predict the correlation between sperm number and chiasma, or that between sperm number and haploid chromosome number. Firstly, we show that phylogenetic inertia cannot account for at least the latter relation, and secondly, a model is presented which incorporates sib competition (intra-ejaculate competition) and sperm competitiveness to explain the relation between sperm numbers and recombination and the question 'Why so many sperms?'. It is argued that if there are deleterious mutations which affect sperm competitiveness this will lead to sib or intra-ejaculate competition. If inter-ejaculate competition also exists, then there will be selection for increased recombination. A chiasmate male heterozygous for n mutations which reduce sperm competitiveness can produce gametes with 0...n mutations. The proportion of gametes with 0 mutations per ejaculate is s = 0.5n, which is a small fraction. This means that to ensure on average one sperm with 0 mutations per ejaculate, a chiasmate male must produce 1/s sperm. We may therefore expect that 1/s will be positively correlated with sperm numbers. If inter-ejaculate competition leads to an optimum sperm number of x, then the optimum number of sperm per ejaculate is x/s. Sperm numbers will be increased by: (i) the number of loci which affect sperm competitiveness in the haploid state; (ii) the mutation rate; and (iii) the recombination rate. A correlation between recombination rates and sperm numbers is therefore to be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8029242     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

1.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Competition between the sperm of a single male can increase the evolutionary rate of haploid expressed genes.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ezawa; Hideki Innan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  No evidence for killer sperm or other selective interactions between human spermatozoa in ejaculates of different males in vitro.

Authors:  H D Moore; M Martin; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Mammalian sperm morphometry.

Authors:  M J Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Within-ejaculate sperm competition.

Authors:  Andreas Sutter; Simone Immler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Sperm variation within a single ejaculate affects offspring development in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Simone Immler; Cosima Hotzy; Ghazal Alavioon; Erik Petersson; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.703

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.