Literature DB >> 8028616

Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients.

J F Burke1, J D Pirsch, E L Ramos, D R Salomon, D M Stablein, D H Van Buren, J C West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The safety of long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients is not well understood. This drug may cause a progressive toxic nephropathy, but it also preserves renal function because it prevents rejection. To determine the effect of cyclosporine on renal function and graft rejection, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data on 1663 renal-transplant recipients at six centers.
RESULTS: The rate of graft survival was 78 percent (median follow-up, 36 months). Grafts were was lost in 279 patients (17 percent), mostly because of acute rejection (68 patients) or chronic graft dysfunction that was unresponsive to a reduction in the dose of cyclosporine (125 patients); 92 patients died with functioning grafts. The median change in the serum creatinine concentration in all patients after transplantation was less than 0.001 mg per deciliter per month (< 0.09 mumol per liter per month). Patients who had episodes of rejection had decreased rates of long-term graft function and survival. Eight percent of patients with functioning grafts at one year had first episodes of rejection more than one year after transplantation. These late first rejections were associated with noncompliance with therapy (in 34 percent), blood cyclosporine concentrations that were marginally lower than those of patients who had no episodes of rejection, and a low rate of successful reversal of rejection (77 percent, vs. 97 percent in patients with rejection during the first year; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of renal-transplant patients tolerate long-term cyclosporine therapy without evidence of progressive toxic nephropathy. Graft failure is most often due to rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028616     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  22 in total

1.  Characterization of renal allograft rejection by urinary proteomic analysis.

Authors:  William Clarke; Benjamin C Silverman; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Andrew S Klein; Ernesto P Molmenti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Induction therapy in renal transplantation : an overview of current developments.

Authors:  Gaetano Ciancio; George W Burke; Joshua Miller
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  XIAP gene expression protects β-cells and human islets from apoptotic cell death.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Ravikiran Panakanti; Feng Li; Ram I Mahato
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The VLDL receptor promotes lipotoxicity and increases mortality in mice following an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jeanna C Perman; Pontus Boström; Malin Lindbom; Ulf Lidberg; Marcus StÅhlman; Daniel Hägg; Henrik Lindskog; Margareta Scharin Täng; Elmir Omerovic; Lillemor Mattsson Hultén; Anders Jeppsson; Petur Petursson; Johan Herlitz; Gunilla Olivecrona; Dudley K Strickland; Kim Ekroos; Sven-Olof Olofsson; Jan Borén
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Immunosuppressant-induced nephropathy: pathophysiology, incidence and management.

Authors:  A J Olyaei; A M de Mattos; W M Bennett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in Japanese renal transplant patients: comprehensive analysis in a single center.

Authors:  Akira Okada; Hidetaka Ushigome; Misaki Kanamori; Aya Morikochi; Hidefumi Kasai; Tadashi Kosaka; Takatoshi Kokuhu; Asako Nishimura; Nobuhito Shibata; Keizo Fukushima; Norio Yoshimura; Nobuyuki Sugioka
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  The risk of coronary artery disease after heart transplantation is increased in patients receiving low-dose cyclosporine, regardless of blood cyclosporine levels.

Authors:  A Gamba; F Mamprin; R Fiocchi; M Senni; G Troise; P Ferrazzi; R Ferrara; G Corbetta
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Weaning of immunosuppression in long-term recipients of living related renal transplants: a preliminary study.

Authors:  G V Mazariegos; H Ramos; R Shapiro; A Zeevi; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of cyclosporine (Imusporin) in renal transplant patients with stable graft function maintained on neoral or bioral.

Authors:  Mrigank S Jha; Aneesh Srivastava; Deepak Dubey; Amit Gupta; R K Sharma; Anant Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04

10.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.