Literature DB >> 8028472

A note on QALYs, time tradeoff, and discounting.

M Johannesson1, J S Pliskin, M C Weinstein.   

Abstract

The theoretical model of QALYs is based on risk neutrality with respect to life years or constant proportional risk posture with respect to life years. It is shown that discounting of QALYs is inconsistent with these assumptions. For discounting to be consistent with individual preferences in a QALY model, individuals have to be risk-neutral with respect to discounted life years or exhibit constant proportional risk posture with respect to discounted life years. For the time-tradeoff method to be consistent with these assumptions, the QALY weights have to be derived by dividing the number of discounted life years in full health by the number of discounted life years in the assessed health states.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028472     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  12 in total

Review 1.  On individual preferences and aggregation in economic evaluation in healthcare.

Authors:  B Liljas; B Lindgren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost.

Authors:  Binh H Yang; Freddie I Bray; D Maxwell Parkin; John W Sellors; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Economic evaluation in healthcare. A brief history and future directions.

Authors:  K Blumenschein; M Johannesson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Methods for measuring temporary health States for cost-utility analyses.

Authors:  Davene R Wright; Eve Wittenberg; J Shannon Swan; Rebecca A Miksad; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Economic Theory and Medical Assistance in Dying.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Comparing the psychometric properties of preference-based and nonpreference-based health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group.

Authors:  L Lalonde; A E Clarke; L Joseph; T Mackenzie; S A Grover
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Lisa A Prosser; James K Hammitt; Ron Keren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Should the arteriovenous fistula be created before starting dialysis?: a decision analytic approach.

Authors:  Swapnil Hiremath; Greg Knoll; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cognitive impairment and preferences for current health.

Authors:  Joseph T King; Joel Tsevat; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  A generalized measurement model to quantify health: the multi-attribute preference response model.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.