Literature DB >> 8028410

Methodological challenges and innovations in patient outcomes research.

C W Maklan1, R Greene, M A Cummings.   

Abstract

Between 1989 and 1992, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) awarded funding to 14 special projects known as Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs). These large, complex projects form the centerpiece of the first generation of research under the Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program. In carrying out their individual 5-year research plans, and through collaborative work of six Inter-PORT Work Groups, PORTs have contributed to methodological advances related to their specific clinical focus and to outcomes research in general. Each of the PORTs has followed a standard research model, involving the application of: systematic literature review, measurement of outcomes, analysis of cost and claims data, decision analysis, and strategies for disseminating findings. This article reports what has been learned by individual PORTs, and by AHCPR, regarding the usefulness of each of these methodologies, both for the ongoing projects and for the next generation of effectiveness research. Example from individual PORTs and work groups illustrate some of the methodological gains that have been made in effectiveness research and provide a glimpse of the work that remains to be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade.

Authors:  D Stryer; S Tunis; H Hubbard; C Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  Jonathan A Finkelstein; Paula Lozano; Kachen A Streiff; Kelly E Arduino; Cynthia A Sisk; Edward H Wagner; Kevin B Weiss; Thomas S Inui
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  [Evolutionary quality assurance. A new concept for improving process and outcome quality].

Authors:  D Köhler; G Goeckenjan; J Rünz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

4.  Analysis of rating appropriateness and patient outcomes in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yoon Jung Choi; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.