Literature DB >> 8028407

Using health status surveys in medical consultations.

R L Street1, W R Gold, T McDowell.   

Abstract

The goal of this research was to identify patients' preferences for physician inquiry into various aspects of health status and to examine whether the preconsultation availability of health status data (collected from the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire) influenced the physician's conduct during the consultation. Results from 58 prenatal patient visits yielded the following findings. First, patients expressed strong preferences for physicians to ask about the patient's perceptions of health in general and about physical dimensions of health status such as pain, vitality, and role limitations due to physical functioning. Patients also were more satisfied when doctors were perceived as having asked about these issues. Second, patients varied considerably in their preferences for physician inquiries into psychosocial issues such as social functioning, mental health, and role limitations due to emotional problems. Approximately half the patients wanted these matters discussed, whereas the remainder either did not care or preferred that doctors not ask about these topics. Third, the preconsultation availability of health status information had little effect on the degree to which physicians asked about the patient's health-related quality of life. Clinical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028407     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  9 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Screening and case finding instruments for depression.

Authors:  S Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

3.  Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Gilbody; David Richards; Stephen Brealey; Catherine Hewitt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Postpartum physical symptoms in new mothers: their relationship to functional limitations and emotional well-being.

Authors:  David A Webb; Joan R Bloch; James C Coyne; Esther K Chung; Ian M Bennett; Jennifer Flatow Culhane
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 6.  Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Mariella M Lane
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Family doctors' involvement with families in Estonia.

Authors:  Marje Oona; Ruth Kalda; Margus Lember; Heidi-Ingrid Maaroos
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  User-centered design and agile development of a novel mobile health application and clinician dashboard to support the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer care.

Authors:  Elena Tsangaris; Maria Edelen; Jessica Means; Madelijn Gregorowitsch; Joanna O'Gorman; Rakasa Pattanaik; Laura Dominici; Michael Hassett; Mary Lynch Witkowski; Kristen Schrieber; Elizabeth Frank; Martha Carnie; Andrea Pusic
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 9.  Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: benefits, acceptability and utilization.

Authors:  Sheila Perry; Theresa L Kowalski; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.186

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.