Literature DB >> 8028034

Dose de-escalation chemoprevention trial of alpha-difluoromethylornithine in patients with colon polyps.

F L Meyskens1, S S Emerson, D Pelot, H Meshkinpour, L R Shassetz, J Einspahr, D S Alberts, E W Gerner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: alpha-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is a potent inhibitor of carcinogenesis in experimental animal models. In these animal models, DFMO has been especially active in preventing carcinogen-induced epithelial cancers, including those of the skin, colon, breast, and urinary bladder. Although DFMO is known to exert its diverse biological effects by suppressing intracellular pools of the polyamines putrescine and spermidine, the precise mechanism by which polyamine depletion, induced by DFMO, suppresses carcinogenesis is unknown.
PURPOSE: The specific aim of our study was to determine the lowest dose of DFMO that would deplete target tissue (colorectal mucosa) levels of these polyamines in humans who had undergone prior removal of colon polyps while producing minimal toxic effects.
METHODS: A dose de-escalation chemoprevention trial of DFMO was conducted in 111 patients (36 female and 75 male) who were in generally good health, aged 39-79, and who had undergone colonoscopy for surgical removal of an adenomatous colon polyp greater than 3 mm within 5 years prior to entering the study. Groups of patients (12-20 patients per group) were orally treated with single, daily doses of DFMO ranging from 3.0 to 0.1 g/m2 for 4 weeks (28 days). Prior to initiation of DFMO treatment and at the end of treatment, six colorectal biopsy specimens were collected from each patient, along with serum samples. All biopsies were performed between 9 AM and noon to avoid possible effects of diurnal variations in laboratory end points. Samples for analysis of plasma DFMO levels were also collected during this time period on the day after the last day of drug administration.
RESULTS: DFMO caused a decrease in both putrescine content and the ratio of spermidine to spermine for all dose groups down to 0.25 g/m2. Both putrescine content and the ratio of spermidine to spermine and changes in these parameters as a function of DFMO treatment decreased as a function of donor age. None of the 30 patients receiving either 0.25 or 0.5 g/m2 experienced any clinical ototoxicity in this trial.
CONCLUSIONS: DFMO is both safe and effective in reducing colorectal mucosal polyamine contents when it is administered orally to patients at doses as low as 0.25 g/m2 for 28 days. No ototoxicity was observed at doses up to twice this amount. IMPLICATIONS: If DFMO is also found to be effective in suppressing polyamine contents in other target tissues, it may be useful in preventing a wide range of human epithelial cancers, including those of the prostate and breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028034     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.15.1122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  24 in total

1.  Levels of rectal mucosal polyamines and prostaglandin E2 predict ability of DFMO and sulindac to prevent colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Betsy C Wertheim; Jason A Zell; Wen-Pin Chen; Christine E McLaren; Bonnie J LaFleur; Frank L Meyskens; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  DFMO: targeted risk reduction therapy for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Christina M Laukaitis; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 3.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study.

Authors:  Brian J Wells; Michael W Kattan; Gregory S Cooper; Leila Jackson; Siran Koroukian
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 5.  Lung cancer. 1: prevention of lung cancer.

Authors:  G E Goodman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Colorectal polyps in the elderly: what should be done?

Authors:  Kenneth Miller; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Inhibition of human ornithine decarboxylase activity by enantiomers of difluoromethylornithine.

Authors:  Ning Qu; Natalia A Ignatenko; Phillip Yamauchi; David E Stringer; Corey Levenson; Patrick Shannon; Scott Perrin; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Associations of a polymorphism in the ornithine decarboxylase gene with colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Jason A Zell; Argyrios Ziogas; Natalia Ignatenko; Jane Honda; Ning Qu; Alexander S Bobbs; Susan L Neuhausen; Eugene W Gerner; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Unbiased metabolite profiling indicates that a diminished thymidine pool is the underlying mechanism of colon cancer chemoprevention by alpha-difluoromethylornithine.

Authors:  Mavee Witherspoon; Qiuying Chen; Levy Kopelovich; Steven S Gross; Steven M Lipkin
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 10.  Polyamines as mediators of APC-dependent intestinal carcinogenesis and cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Nathaniel S Rial; Frank L Meyskens; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 8.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.