Literature DB >> 8027716

Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task.

M J Sugg1, J E McDonald.   

Abstract

Translation models of the Stroop effect predict inhibition when the relevant stimulus type does not match the response type, but a lack of inhibition when it matches. All 4 combinations of relevant stimulus type (color or word) and response type (color or word) were evaluated at several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) in a button-pressing version of the Stroop task to assess this prediction. Inhibition was greatest when the relevant stimulus type did not match the response type. However, in contrast to predictions of translation models, color and word responses produced different patterns of inhibition and facilitation over SOA, implying differences in the word-to-color and color-to-word translation mechanisms, and inhibition was obtained in both of the color-response tasks. A modification of the translation model is proposed that incorporates a translation mechanism and accommodates special characteristics of word processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027716     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.3.647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty.

Authors:  Churs Blais; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

5.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

6.  Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks.

Authors:  D Sharma; F P McKenna
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

7.  The numerical distance effect is task dependent.

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik; Orly Rubinsten; Yafit Bloch-David; Limor Gertner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

8.  A functional dissociation of conflict processing within anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Chobok Kim; James K Kroger; Jeounghoon Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Carsten N Boehler; Robert Won; Lauren Davis; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.