Literature DB >> 8027377

Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports.

F Campbell1, D F Griffiths.   

Abstract

An audit of histopathology reports presents the problem that the output is textual and difficult to quantify. This makes the definition of an adequate report subjective and susceptible to observer variation. A procedure has been developed which allows the quantitative analysis of reports and facilitates the development of local reporting guidelines. A topic is selected; the auditor then lists the possible details that may be included in the report and notes how many reports from a sample include each detail. The results are discussed at a departmental meeting with the aim of agreeing on reporting guidelines. At a later date another sample of reports can be analysed for compliance with the guidelines and compared with the previous reports. Problems with compliance can be discussed further and at the audit meeting the guidelines may be amended appropriately, thus completing the audit cycle. This method of audit has the advantage that the results are quantitative and that the group discussion and re-examination of the guidelines has educational value.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027377      PMCID: PMC501943          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.4.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  2 in total

1.  Local audit of surgical pathology. 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital.

Authors:  A D Ramsay; P J Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Guidelines for medical audit: seven principles.

Authors:  C D Shaw; D W Costain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19
  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effect of using templates on the information included in histopathology reports on specimens of uterine cervix taken by loop excision of the transformation zone.

Authors:  W A Reid; A I al-Nafussi; G Rebello; A R Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Quantitative audit of histopathology reports.

Authors:  M K Heatley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Phraseology in pathology reports. A comparative study of interpretation among pathologists and surgeons.

Authors:  R L Attanoos; A D Bull; A G Douglas-Jones; L J Fligelstone; D Semararo
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  M A Appleton; A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports.

Authors:  S B Coghill
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.

Authors:  A D Bull; A H Biffin; J Mella; A G Radcliffe; J D Stamatakis; R J Steele; G T Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Authors' reply.

Authors:  K K Deodhar; B Rekhi; S Menon; B Ganesh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

8.  Performing audit in histopathology.

Authors:  S K Raina
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

9.  Compliance with reporting guidelines by Australian pathologists: an audit of the quality of histopathology reporting in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Alison White; Vicki Fabian; Kerrie McDonald; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.