Literature DB >> 8027359

The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption.

T W Hu1, J Bai, T E Keeler, P G Barnett, H Y Sung.   

Abstract

In 1988, California voters enacted Proposition 99, increasing the tax on cigarettes by 25 cents per pack, effective January 1989. Monthly sales data reported by the California State Board of Equalization between 1984 and 1991, adjusted for seasonal variation and time trend, show that consumption of cigarettes in January 1989 was about 25 percent less than would have been expected in the absence of the tax. By December 1989 consumption was reduced to 9.5 percent below the pre-Proposition trend, an amount sustained throughout 1991. Additional taxation and a different form of taxation on cigarettes may further be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  8 in total

1.  Trends in adult cigarette smoking in California compared with the rest of the United States, 1978-1994.

Authors:  M Siegel; P D Mowery; T P Pechacek; W J Strauss; M W Schooley; R K Merritt; T E Novotny; G A Giovino; M P Eriksen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The behaviour of purchasing smuggled cigarettes in Taiwan.

Authors:  Y-W Tsai; H-Y Sung; C-L Yang; S-F Shih
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  A major state tobacco tax increase, the master settlement agreement, and cigarette consumption: the California experience.

Authors:  Hai-Yen Sung; Teh-wei Hu; Michael Ong; Theodore E Keeler; Mei-ling Sheu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign.

Authors:  T W Hu; H Y Sung; T E Keeler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control.

Authors:  S A Bialous; B J Fox; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  U.S. congressional district cancer death rates.

Authors:  Yongping Hao; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Linda W Pickle; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Youth are more sensitive to price changes in cigarettes than adults.

Authors:  Alexander Ding
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2003

8.  Public opinion regarding earmarked cigarette tax in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Tsai; Lee-Lan Yen; Chung-Lin Yang; Pei-Fen Chen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.