| Literature DB >> 8027288 |
I C Macleod1, D S Irvine, A Masterton, A Taylor, A A Templeton.
Abstract
A comparative assessment of the conventional criteria of semen quality (sperm concentration, motility and morphology) was undertaken by standard laboratory techniques and by means of a computer-assisted image analysis system (the Hamilton-Thorn HTM-S 2030) in an open prospective study, in the context of a service andrology laboratory. A total of 1435 semen samples submitted by couples in the course of routine infertility investigations were examined by both methods, and the results compared. It was observed that the method did not provide comparable data on semen quality, either in respect of sperm concentration or graded motility, while the morphometric data generated by the HTM-S did not appear to be related to conventional morphology assessment. The clinical value of such systems in the assessment of the classical determinants of semen quality requires formal assessment in properly conducted large scale prospective studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1994 PMID: 8027288 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.918