Literature DB >> 8027155

Primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. Survival analysis of 113 consecutive cases.

M J Kraay1, M P Figgie, A E Inglis, S W Wolfe, C S Ranawat.   

Abstract

We used survival analysis to evaluate 113 consecutive semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) in 95 patients at a maximum follow-up of 99 months. Our criteria for failure were mechanical malfunction, revision for any reason, and deep infection. The primary diagnosis was inflammatory arthritis in 86 elbows, post-traumatic arthritis in 6, supracondylar nonunion or fracture in 12, osteoarthritis in 2 and other causes in 3. Seven failures were due to deep infection, and five of these had a primary diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. Eight failures were revised or had revision recommended for aseptic loosening, and six of these were in patients with post-traumatic arthritis or supracondylar nonunion. The cumulative survival for TEAs performed for post-traumatic arthritis, fractures or supracondylar nonunion was 73% at three years and 53% at five years, significantly worse than the cumulative three- and five-year survivals of 92% and 90%, respectively, for patients with inflammatory arthritis. TEA with a semiconstrained prosthesis appears to have a satisfactory survival in selected patients with arthritic disorders. The incidence of deep infection was reduced by improvements in surgical technique and postoperative management, and the routine use of antibiotic-impregnated cement. The incidence of aseptic loosening was low, except in patients with supracondylar nonunion or post-traumatic arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

1.  Bicolumnar 90-90 plating of low-energy distal humeral fractures in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Daniel F Leigey; Dana J Farrell; Peter A Siska; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

Review 2.  Total elbow arthroplasty is moving forward: Review on past, present and future.

Authors:  Ante Prkić; Christiaan Ja van Bergen; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 3.  Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts, and future.

Authors:  Saccomanni Bernardino
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Outcome of Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Posttraumatic Conditions with Analysis of Bushing Wear on Stress Radiographs.

Authors:  Jenniefer Y Kho; Brian D Adams; Howard O'Rourke
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 5.  [Differential arthroplasty and endoprosthesis indications in rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow joint].

Authors:  B F Morrey
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Comparison of short- to medium-term results of Coonrad-Morrey elbow replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus patients after elbow injuries.

Authors:  Karol Szyluk; Wojciech Widuchowski; Andrzej Jasiński; Bogdan Koczy; Jerzy Widuchowski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-01-07

7.  Primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar; Sunayan Mahanta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty in the United States: Evaluation of Cost, Patient Demographics, and Complication Rates.

Authors:  Hanbing Zhou; Nathan D Orvets; Gabriel Merlin; Joshua Shaw; Joshua S Dines; Mark D Price; Josef K Eichinger; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 9.  New Ti-Alloys and Surface Modifications to Improve the Mechanical Properties and the Biological Response to Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Yvoni Kirmanidou; Margarita Sidira; Maria-Eleni Drosou; Vincent Bennani; Athina Bakopoulou; Alexander Tsouknidas; Nikolaos Michailidis; Konstantinos Michalakis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.