Literature DB >> 8026038

Coronary vasodilator reserve, pain perception, and sex in patients with syndrome X.

S D Rosen1, N G Uren, J C Kaski, D Tousoulis, G J Davies, P G Camici.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether myocardial ischemia due to coronary microvascular dysfunction is the cause of chest pain in syndrome X (chest pain, ischemic-like stress ECG despite angiographically normal coronary arteries). To assess the function of the coronary microcirculation and its relation to pain perception, we measured myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary vasodilator reserve (CVR) in 29 patients with syndrome X and 20 matched normal control subjects. METHODS AND
RESULTS: MBF at rest and after intravenous dipyridamole (0.56 mg.kg-1 over 4 minutes) was measured using positron emission tomography with H2(15)O. CVR was calculated as MBFdipyridamole/MBFrest. ECG changes and chest pain after dipyridamole in syndrome X were compared with those in 35 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Resting and postdipyridamole MBFs were homogeneous throughout the left ventricle in syndrome X patients and control subjects. MBF was 1.05 (0.25), mean (SD) versus 1.00 (0.22) mL.min-1.g-1 (P = NS) at rest and 2.73 (0.81) versus 3.00 (1.00) mL.min-1.g-1 (P = NS) after dipyridamole in patients and control subjects, respectively. CVRs were 2.66 (0.76) and 3.06 (1.08) (P = NS) and after correction of resting MBF for rate-pressure product were 2.35 (0.83) and 2.34 (0.90) (P = NS) in patients and control subjects, respectively. Female syndrome X patients had higher resting MBF than males, at 1.18 (0.20) versus 0.88 (0.19) mL.min-1.g-1 (P < .001). Chest pain after dipyridamole occurred in syndrome X as frequently as in CAD (21/29 versus 22/35, P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: When patients with syndrome X are compared with control subjects, no differences are found in MBF either at rest or after dipyridamole, despite syndrome X patients experiencing chest pain after dipyridamole to the same extent as patients with CAD. These findings, together with the absence of any relation among MBF, chest pain, and ECG changes under stress, cast further doubt on ischemia as the basis of the chest pain, at least in the majority of syndrome X patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8026038     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.1.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  28 in total

1.  Theodore E. Woodward Award. Ischemic heart disease in women: the role of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  C J Pepine
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1999

2.  Effect of oral aminophylline in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X).

Authors:  P M Elliott; K Krzyzowska-Dickinson; R Calvino; C Hann; J C Kaski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  The complex link between brain and heart in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  G A Lanza; F Crea
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Noninvasive prediction of coronary artery disease progression by comparison of serial exercise electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Olaf Rodriguez; Eugenio Picano; Silvio Fedele; Martha Morelos; Mario Marzilli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Non-invasive imaging of microvascular damage.

Authors:  L Galiuto; L Natale; L Leccisotti; G Locorotondo; A Giordano; L Bonomo; F Crea
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Microvascular angina and the continuing dilemma of chest pain with normal coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Richard O Cannon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Clinical cardiac PET: quo vadis?

Authors:  H R Schelbert; J Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow: the technical and clinical prospects for single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  J Maddahi; J Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014.

Authors:  Shilpa Agrawal; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 10.  Syndrome X--angina and normal coronary angiography.

Authors:  A Chauhan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.