Literature DB >> 8024625

Bone mineral density of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis.

N F Peel1, A J Spittlehouse, D E Bax, R Eastell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility, accuracy, and linearity of hand bone mineral content (BMC) measurements, and to evaluate the influence of hand posture; to determine the relationship of hand bone mineral density (BMD) to generalized osteopenia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and to determine the relationship between hand BMD and disease severity in early RA.
METHODS: Hand BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We studied 70 postmenopausal women with steroid-treated RA (established RA), ages 49-79, and 20 age-matched healthy controls to determine the relationship to generalized osteoporosis; we also studied 20 patients aged 23-74 years with early RA to determine the relationship between disease severity and hand BMD.
RESULTS: Reproducibility of hand BMD was to within 1%. In established RA, there was a greater decrease in juxtaarticular BMD (23% at the hand) than in generalized BMD (16% at the femoral neck, 11% at the lumbar spine, and 11% total body) compared with that in age-matched controls. Hand BMD correlated with skeletal size and BMD at other skeletal sites. In established RA, there was no effect of disease duration, disability, or steroid therapy. In early RA, hand BMD correlated with age and disease activity.
CONCLUSION: Measurement of hand BMD by DXA is accurate and precise. Hand BMD reflects BMD at other skeletal sites in patients with RA, and is a marker of disease severity in patients with early disease. It may be a sensitive marker of disease progression and response to therapeutic intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024625     DOI: 10.1002/art.1780370702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  24 in total

1.  Use of digital x ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W B Jawaid; D Crosbie; J Shotton; D M Reid; A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Should we look for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  W F Lems; B A Dijkmans
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gamze Kilic; Salih Ozgocmen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

4.  Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  P Röben; R Barkmann; S Ullrich; A Gause; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.

Authors:  V Camozzi; F Lumachi; F Mantero; M Piccolo; G Luisetto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function.

Authors:  Beril Dogu; Banu Kuran; Figen Yilmaz; Ahmet Usen; Hulya Sirzai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.

Authors:  B Juhász; K Gulyás; Á Horváth; Z Pethő; H P Bhattoa; A Váncsa; É Szekanecz; C Horváth; J Kocsis; Z Horváth; K Hodosi; S Szántó; G Szűcs; Z Szekanecz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Measurement of periarticular bone mineral density in the hands of patients with early inflammatory arthritis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Eithne Murphy; Barry Bresnihan; Oliver FitzGerald
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital x ray radiogrammetry than dual x ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  T Jensen; M Klarlund; M Hansen; K E Jensen; J Pødenphant; T M Hansen; H Skjødt; L Hyldstrup
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.