Literature DB >> 8024448

Laparoscopic sonography. An alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography?

M A Röthlin1, R Schlumpf, F Largiadèr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laparoscopic sonography (LS) could be a valid alternative to intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in the detection of bile duct stones and anatomical variations.
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study comparing LS and IOC using intraoperative findings and/or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the gold standard.
SETTING: Department of Surgery at Zürich University Hospital, Switzerland. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1992 and January 1993. Twenty-three patients were operated on for acute cholecystitis, while the remainder experienced symptomatic bile duct stones. Ninety-six patients underwent preoperative sonography and 85 underwent intravenous cholangiography. Laparoscopic sonography was performed in all patients after dissection of the cystic duct.
INTERVENTIONS: A 5.5-MHz sector scanner with a 360 degrees angle and an optimal depth of 1 to 4 cm was used. After LS, IOC was performed with a 4F ureteric catheter and a modern fluoroscope. Patients with bile duct stones were sent for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography postoperatively or the stones were removed laparoscopically.
RESULTS: Unsuspected common duct stones in three patients and several small calculi in the cystic duct in one patient were detected intraoperatively. Sensitivities and specificities for the detection of bile duct calculi were 100% and 98% by LS and 75% and 99% by IOC, respectively. Anatomical variations of the extrahepatic bile ducts were detected by LS in 20 patients and by IOC in 21 patients. Laparoscopic sonography visualized variations of the hepatic arteries in 22 patients. The average time consumption for LS was 5.4 minutes (range, 2 to 12 minutes) and 16.4 minutes for IOC (range, 4 to 37 minutes).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sonography is a quick and reliable intraoperative diagnostic tool and could replace IOC in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additional trials in a larger patient population are needed for a final assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024448     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420310024004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  G V Stiegmann; N J Soper; C J Filipi; R C McIntyre; M P Callery; J F Cordova
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative cholangiography in detection of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  K N Jamal; H Smith; K Ratnasingham; M R Siddiqui; G McLachlan; A P Belgaumkar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Santambrogio; P Bianchi; E Opocher; A Mantovani; L Schubert; F Ghelma; M Panzera; M Verga; G P Spina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Intraoperative ultrasonography in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: an overview.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  The utility of intracorporeal ultrasonography for screening of the bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J S Wu; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.