Literature DB >> 8024265

Responsiveness of the somatosensory system after nerve injury and amputation in the human hand.

W Schady1, S Braune, S Watson, H E Torebjörk, R Schmidt.   

Abstract

We studied the responsiveness of the somatosensory system in humans after prolonged deprivation of peripheral input. Eight patients with traumatic transection of the median or ulnar nerve and 6 patients with amputation of a finger or hand underwent microneurography and intraneural stimulation. Bundles of nerve fibers were electrically stimulated through a microelectrode placed in the affected nerve proximally to the site of damage or in the case of amputees, in a nerve fascicle supplying the stump. During intraneural stimulation the subjects with nerve injuries reported distinct percepts in the hypoesthetic skin. Their projections were usually confined to the territory of a single or two adjacent palmar digital nerves, similar to the fascicular territories of healthy nerves in control subjects, but there was much less microneurographically recordable afferent activity than in normal subjects. In amputees intraneural stimulation evoked sensations in a phantom digit or digits in over three fourths of the fascicles studied. We conclude that (1) the somatosensory system remains able to process information from a nerve fascicle that has lost its cutaneous territory, and (2) somatosensory localization remains accurate despite the presumed central reorganization that takes place after nerve division or amputation. This lack of functional adaptation has important implications with regard to our understanding of human central nervous system plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024265     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410360114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  11 in total

1.  Where is hidden the ghost in phantom sensations?

Authors:  Michelangelo Buonocore
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Developmental adaptation of rat nociceptive withdrawal reflexes after neonatal tendon transfer.

Authors:  H Holmberg; J Schouenborg; Y B Yu; H R Weng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; C M Phegan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Anaesthesia changes perceived finger width but not finger length.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Damon Hoad; John C Rothwell; Simon C Gandevia; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  AMPA and GABA(A/B) receptor subunit expression in the cuneate nucleus of adult squirrel monkeys during peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Polina V Kostylev; Preston E Garraghty
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Bilateral behavioral and regional cerebral blood flow changes during painful peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat.

Authors:  P E Paulson; T J Morrow; K L Casey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Differences in AMPA and GABAA/B receptor subunit expression between the chronically reorganized cortex and brainstem of adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Rohini M Sarin; Polina V Kostylev; Preston E Garraghty
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Motor priming in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Stoykov; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Decoding of grasping information from neural signals recorded using peripheral intrafascicular interfaces.

Authors:  Silvestro Micera; Paolo M Rossini; Jacopo Rigosa; Luca Citi; Jacopo Carpaneto; Stanisa Raspopovic; Mario Tombini; Christian Cipriani; Giovanni Assenza; Maria C Carrozza; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Ken Yoshida; Xavier Navarro; Paolo Dario
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  What can errors tell us about body representations?

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.