Literature DB >> 8024219

Peritonsillar abscess: repeated needle aspiration versus incision and drainage.

M Wolf1, I Even-Chen, J Kronenberg.   

Abstract

The study evaluates the management of peritonsillar abscess (PTA) by comparing needle aspiration versus incision and drainage of the abscess. Twenty-four of 86 patients treated by needle aspiration underwent a single aspiration, and 38 had 2, 19 had 3, and 5 had 4 aspirations before the abscess resolved. A significant amount of pus, up to 8, 5, and 3 mL, respectively, was detected in the subsequent aspirations. Recurrent PTA was noted in 20 patients (23.26%). In 9 of these patients (10.47%) the recurrent episode occurred immediately (in less than 1 month) and was considered residual disease. Seventy-four patients were treated by incision and drainage, and none had an immediate recurrence. Only 3 (4.05%) patients developed a late recurrent episode. The difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups is statistically significant. A history of recurrent tonsillitis prior to abscess formation did not show a significant influence on the recurrence rate. A high incidence of streptococcal infections was noted in both groups, with anaerobes detected in only 15% of samples. There was a good response to penicillin-resistant organisms. Although needle aspiration is a tempting modality for treating PTA in community clinics, one should be aware of the risks of a higher incidence of residual and recurrent disease in comparison to incision and drainage, as well as the need for repeated aspirations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024219     DOI: 10.1177/000348949410300709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  15 in total

1.  National audit of the management of peritonsillar abscess.

Authors:  H M Mehanna; L Al-Bahnasawi; A White
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  [Therapy options for peritonsillar abscess].

Authors:  P Federspil
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Management strategies of peritonsillar abscess in the tropics: a survey of surgeons' preference.

Authors:  A M Kodiya; Y B Ngamdu; B M Sandabe; A Isa; H I Garandawa
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-03-13

4.  Medical and surgical treatment of peritonsillar, retropharyngeal, and parapharyngeal abscesses.

Authors:  Fred S Herzon; Angela D Martin
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Implication of Fusobacterium necrophorum in recurrence of peritonsillar abscess.

Authors:  S Ahmed Ali; Kevin J Kovatch; Josh Smith; Emily L Bellile; John E Hanks; Paul T Hoff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess.

Authors:  Brent A Chang; Andrew Thamboo; Martin J Burton; Chris Diamond; Desmond A Nunez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-23

7.  Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage under local anaesthesia for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess.

Authors:  Meng-Si Luo; Guan-Jiang Huang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Peritonsillar abscess: remember to always think twice.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr; Alexandra Zurawski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [Trends and complications in the management of peritonsillar abscess with emphasis on children].

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; S Remmert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Peritonsillar abscess in a 40-day-old infant.

Authors:  Soon Min Lee; Byoung Chul Kwon; Sung Yon Choi; Myung Hyun Sohn; Kyu-Earn Kim; Choon Sik Yoon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.