Literature DB >> 8024086

Community participation in vector control: lessons from Chagas' disease.

R T Bryan1, F Balderrama, R J Tonn, J C Dias.   

Abstract

As applied to vector-borne disease control, the term community participation has been broadly interpreted. Community-based vector control projects have been described as having both active and passive components. Recently, community participation in organized efforts to control Chagas' disease has become more dynamic, with increasingly active involvement by local community members. Chagas' disease is a particularly significant vector-borne disease problem in the South American countries of Brazil, Venezuela, and Bolivia, and health officials there are beginning to emphasize horizontal or decentralized approaches to control of triatomine vectors. Experience suggests that vector control programs using community participation have significant and sustainable impact on vector density, appear to be more cost-effective than purely vertically structured programs, are readily integrated with other health or development programs, promote an enduring sense of pride in home and community, and are politically viable vector control strategies. Community participation per se has inherent value because of its positive effect on social relationships and community solidarity. Moreover, it is a dynamic process that results in accrued benefits for public health that exceed most vector control program goals and persist well beyond program termination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Bolivia; Brazil; Chagas Disease--prevention and control; Community Participation; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diseases; Economic Factors; Geographic Factors; Housing; Latin America; Parasitic Diseases; Population; Population Characteristics; Program Activities; Programs; Residence Characteristics; Rural Population; Socioeconomic Factors; South America; Spatial Distribution; Venezuela

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024086     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  11 in total

1.  To spray or not to spray? Understanding participation in an indoor residual spray campaign in Arequipa, Peru.

Authors:  Valerie A Paz-Soldán; Karin M Bauer; Gabrielle C Hunter; Ricardo Castillo-Neyra; Vanessa D Arriola; Daniel Rivera-Lanas; Geoffrey H Rodriguez; Amparo M Toledo Vizcarra; Lina M Mollesaca Riveros; Michael Z Levy; Alison M Buttenheim
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2016-05-17

2.  Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina.

Authors:  Ricardo E Gürtler; Uriel Kitron; M Carla Cecere; Elsa L Segura; Joel E Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is participation contagious? Evidence from a household vector control campaign in urban Peru.

Authors:  Alison M Buttenheim; Valerie Paz-Soldan; Corentin Barbu; Christine Skovira; Javier Quintanilla Calderón; Lina Margot Mollesaca Riveros; Juan Oswaldo Cornejo; Dylan S Small; Christina Bicchieri; Cesar Naquira; Michael Z Levy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Impact of community-based vector control on house infestation and Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Triatoma infestans, dogs and cats in the Argentine Chaco.

Authors:  M V Cardinal; M A Lauricella; P L Marcet; M M Orozco; U Kitron; R E Gürtler
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  An affordable, quality-assured community-based system for high-resolution entomological surveillance of vector mosquitoes that reflects human malaria infection risk patterns.

Authors:  Prosper P Chaki; Yeromin Mlacha; Daniel Msellemu; Athuman Muhili; Alpha D Malishee; Zacharia J Mtema; Samson S Kiware; Ying Zhou; Neil F Lobo; Tanya L Russell; Stefan Dongus; Nicodem J Govella; Gerry F Killeen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 6.  Community participation in Chagas disease vector surveillance: systematic review.

Authors:  Fernando Abad-Franch; M Celeste Vega; Miriam S Rolón; Walter S Santos; Antonieta Rojas de Arias
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-06-21

Review 7.  The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination.

Authors:  Jo-An Atkinson; Andrew Vallely; Lisa Fitzgerald; Maxine Whittaker; Marcel Tanner
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Shading by napier grass reduces malaria vector larvae in natural habitats in Western Kenya highlands.

Authors:  Peter M Wamae; Andrew K Githeko; Diana M Menya; Willem Takken
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  Door to door survey and community participation to implement a new county mosquito control program in Wayne County, North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Amanda Grantham; Alice L Anderson; Timothy Kelley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Cost-effectiveness of chagas disease vector control strategies in Northwestern Argentina.

Authors:  Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec; Cynthia Spillmann; Mario Zaidenberg; Uriel Kitron; Ricardo E Gürtler
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2009-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.