Literature DB >> 8023425

Quantitative assessment of surface roughness using backscattered ultrasound: the effects of finite surface curvature.

E H Chiang1, R S Adler, C R Meyer, J M Rubin, D K Dedrick, T J Laing.   

Abstract

We have previously described a technique to quantify surface fibrillatory changes in osteoarthritic articular cartilage. In that study, the angular distribution of the scattered acoustic field from an insonifying source directly related to the distribution of surface fibrillatory changes. In the current study, we demonstrate a more sensitive method to quantify surface roughness, the effect of global surface curvature in estimating surface roughness and the utility of using focused transducers in circumventing this potential problem for in vivo work. Phantoms composed of acrylic rods with and without sandpaper grit (about 15 to 72 microns, mean particle size) applied to the surface were scanned. A more robust angular scattering technique to measure the angle dependent data was employed, in which the integrated squared pressure amplitude over a finite time window (mean power) was measured as a function of incident acoustic angle for varying surface roughnesses and radii of curvature. We show that the potential dynamic range for making roughness discriminations diminishes with decreasing radius of curvature of the acrylic rod phantoms using an unfocused transducer. This effect is minimized with use of a focused transducer. Roughness effects are most evident at sufficiently large angles where incoherent scattering dominates. We conclude that the roughness of cylindrically curved surfaces can be quantitatively assessed using a focused ultrasound beam at sufficiently large incident angles, given that the focal spot size is sufficiently smaller than the radius of curvature of the surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8023425     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90077-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrasound speed in articular cartilage measured by different time-of-flight methods.

Authors:  Satoru Ohashi; Isao Ohnishi; Takuya Matsumoto; Juntaro Matsuyama; Masahiko Bessho; Kenji Tobita; Masako Kaneko; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Chondropenia: current concept review.

Authors:  A Speziali; M Delcogliano; M Tei; G Placella; M Chillemi; R Tiribuzi; G Cerulli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-06-13

3.  Ultrasound properties of articular cartilage immediately after osteochondral grafting surgery: in cases of traumatic cartilage lesions and osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuroki; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Koji Mori; Masahiko Kobayashi; Shinichiro Nakamura; Kohei Nishitani; Takaaki Shirai; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Potential of High-Frequency Ultrasound for Arthroscopic Examination of the Shoulder Joint.

Authors:  Jani Puhakka; Isaac O Afara; Teemu Paatela; Markus J Sormaala; Matti A Timonen; Tuomas Virén; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Acoustic stiffness and change in plug cartilage over time after autologous osteochondral grafting: correlation between ultrasound signal intensity and histological score in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuroki; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Koji Mori; Mao Ohba; Takashi Suzuki; Yasuyuki Mizuno; Keiji Ando; Makoto Takenaka; Ken Ikeuchi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis by Cartilage Surface Smoothness Quantified Automatically from Knee MRI.

Authors:  Sudhakar Tummala; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Morten A Karsdal; Erik B Dam
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Arthroscopic Ultrasound Assessment of Articular Cartilage in the Human Knee Joint: A Potential Diagnostic Method.

Authors:  Erna Kaleva; Tuomas Virén; Simo Saarakkala; Janne Sahlman; Joonas Sirola; Jani Puhakka; Teemu Paatela; Heikki Kröger; Ilkka Kiviranta; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Miniaturized Water-Jet Ultrasound Indentation System for Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage Degeneration: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Huang; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Quantifying Complex Micro-Topography of Degenerated Articular Cartilage Surface by Contrast-Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography and Parametric Analyses.

Authors:  Tuomo Ylitalo; Mikko A J Finnilä; Harpal K Gahunia; Sakari S Karhula; Heikki Suhonen; Maarit Valkealahti; Petri Lehenkari; Edward Haeggström; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Simo Saarakkala; Heikki J Nieminen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Ultrasound properties of articular cartilage in the tibio-femoral joint in knee osteoarthritis: relation to clinical assessment (International Cartilage Repair Society grade).

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuroki; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Koji Mori; Masahiko Kobayashi; Ko Yasura; Yukihiro Okamoto; Takashi Suzuki; Kohei Nishitani; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.