Literature DB >> 8022705

Short- and long-term reproducibility of QT, QTc, and QT dispersion measurement in healthy subjects.

J Kautzner1, G Yi, A J Camm, M Malik.   

Abstract

The study investigated interobserver and intrasubject reproducibility of QT interval duration and dispersion measured in standard 12-lead ECGs recorded at 25 mm/sec. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were studied. Each underwent four ECG recordings, which were performed 1, 7, and 30 days apart. Two independent observers analyzed each ECG record. In each lead with a distinguishable T wave pattern, the RR interval, Q-peak of T interval, and Q-end of T interval were measured using a digitizing board with a 0.1-mm resolution. From each recording the following measures were derived: the maximum, minimum, and mean QT interval; maximum, minimum, and mean heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc); QT and QTc dispersion (the difference between the maximum and minimum QT interval among the 12 leads); and adjusted QT and QTc dispersion (dispersion divided by the square root of the number of leads measured). The interobserver and short-term (1 day) and long-term (1 week and 1 month) reproducibility of individual indices was assessed by computing the relative errors and comparing them by a standard sign test. In addition, the distributions of maximum and minimum QTc values among electrocardiographic leads, and the differences between QT-end and QT-peak based measurements were investigated. The results showed that: (1) the measurement of the QT interval from standard ECG recordings is feasible and not operator dependent (interobserver relative error < 4%); (2) the duration of the QT interval in healthy volunteers is stable and its short- and long-term reproducibility is high (intrasubject relative error < 6%); (3) parameters that characterize dispersion of the QT interval in the 12-lead ECG are highly nonreproducible, both between subsequent recording (relative error of 25%-35%) and between observers (relative error 28%-33%), the reproducibility of QT dispersion is significantly lower than that of QT duration (P < 0.01); and (4) the duration of the entire QT interval correlates only weakly with the duration of the Q-peak of T interval.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8022705     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01435.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  32 in total

1.  Reproducibility of QT parameters derived from 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings in healthy subjects.

Authors:  H Arildsen; E H Christiansen; A K Pedersen; H Mølgaard
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Beat-to-beat QT dynamics in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Berit T Jensen; Charlotte E Larroude; Lars P Rasmussen; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou; Michael V Hojgaard; Erik Agner; Jørgen K Kanters
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Comparing methods of measurement for detecting drug-induced changes in the QT interval: implications for thoroughly conducted ECG studies.

Authors:  Nkechi E Azie; Gregory Adams; Borje Darpo; Steven F Francom; Emery C Polasek; Joy M Wisser; Joseph C Fleishaker
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  The QT interval and psychotropic medications in children: recommendations for clinicians.

Authors:  Paul McNally; Fiona McNicholas; Paul Oslizlok
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  [Pathophysiologic relevance and prognostic value of QT dispersion].

Authors:  M Zabel; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

6.  PC-Based ECG waveform recognition-validation of novel software against a reference ECG database.

Authors:  Corina-Dana Dota; Nils Edvardsson; Bo Skallefell; Gunnar Fager
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  QTc interval, and autonomic and somatic nerve function in diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  H Katsuoka; Y Mimori; K Kurokawa; T Harada; T Kohriyama; F Ishizaki; A Harada; S Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.435

8.  Measurement error as a source of QT dispersion: a computerised analysis.

Authors:  J A Kors; G van Herpen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Drug-induced torsades de pointes and implications for drug development.

Authors:  Robert R Fenichel; Marek Malik; Charles Antzelevitch; Michael Sanguinetti; Dan M Roden; Silvia G Priori; Jeremy N Ruskin; Raymond J Lipicky; Louis R Cantilena
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-04

Review 10.  [Standard-ECG].

Authors:  Bernd-Dieter Gonska
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.