PURPOSE: We used two different methods to administer high-dose etoposide (VP-16) during a myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy regimen before bone marrow transplantation (BMT). VP-16 was administered either diluted (0.5 mg/mL) or undiluted (20 mg/mL), with or without busulfan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 17 patients during the infusion (6 hours) and thereafter daily until 2 days after BMT. VP-16 concentrations were measured in all plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrochemical detection, and the results were analyzed with a pharmacokinetic data analysis system. RESULTS: All calculated pharmacokinetic parameters in the two patient groups (VP-16 administered diluted or undiluted) were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in half-lives, mean residence time (MRT), volume of distribution, total clearance, or area under the curve (AUC). VP-16 was found in blood samples from eight of 17 patients at the time of BMT. Significant differences in systemic drug exposure and systemic clearance were found when patients were grouped according to treatment with busulfan or with total-body irradiation (TBI). CONCLUSION: The two administration modes for VP-16, either diluted or undiluted, are bioequivalent in pharmacokinetic terms. The terminal half-lives were longer than expected and resulted in significant VP-16 plasma levels at the time of BMT. The biologic significance remains unclear. Busulfan and/or concomitant medication with phenytoin influence plasma clearance (clp) and systemic drug exposure significantly.
PURPOSE: We used two different methods to administer high-dose etoposide (VP-16) during a myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy regimen before bone marrow transplantation (BMT). VP-16 was administered either diluted (0.5 mg/mL) or undiluted (20 mg/mL), with or without busulfan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 17 patients during the infusion (6 hours) and thereafter daily until 2 days after BMT. VP-16 concentrations were measured in all plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrochemical detection, and the results were analyzed with a pharmacokinetic data analysis system. RESULTS: All calculated pharmacokinetic parameters in the two patient groups (VP-16 administered diluted or undiluted) were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in half-lives, mean residence time (MRT), volume of distribution, total clearance, or area under the curve (AUC). VP-16 was found in blood samples from eight of 17 patients at the time of BMT. Significant differences in systemic drug exposure and systemic clearance were found when patients were grouped according to treatment with busulfan or with total-body irradiation (TBI). CONCLUSION: The two administration modes for VP-16, either diluted or undiluted, are bioequivalent in pharmacokinetic terms. The terminal half-lives were longer than expected and resulted in significant VP-16 plasma levels at the time of BMT. The biologic significance remains unclear. Busulfan and/or concomitant medication with phenytoin influence plasma clearance (clp) and systemic drug exposure significantly.
Authors: E J Kanfer; D McGuigan; D Samson; Z Abboudi; G Abrahamson; J F Apperley; S Chilcott; C Craddock; J Davis; C MacDonald; D Macdonald; E Olavarria; N Philpott; G J Rustin; M J Seckl; M Sekhar; S Stern; E S Newlands Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 7.640