Literature DB >> 8021578

Direct and indirect blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

B Fagher1, J Magnússon, T Thulin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare intrabrachial blood pressure (I-BP) with simultaneously measured contralateral auscultatory (A-)BP in hypertensive and normotensive subjects. The question was whether differences between direct and indirect BP are influenced by the BP levels.
SUBJECTS: Hypertensive subjects treated with either placebo (n = 10) or metoprolol (n = 8) and age-matched normotensive subjects (n = 15), selected from a defined patient population waiting for cholecystectomy or hernia repair. Measurements were performed pre-induction of anaesthesia.
RESULTS: In the hypertensive subjects, cuff systolic BP (SBP) was lower than I-BP by an average of 8 mmHg (placebo-) and 7 mmHg (metoprolol-treated), whereas diastolic A-BP (A-DBP) was 3 and 7 mmHg higher, respectively. In the normotensive subjects, mean A-SBP and I-SBP agreed closely, whereas A-DBP was 11 mmHg higher. Thus, SBP differences (i.e. indirect-direct BP) were significantly less and DBP differences significantly greater in the normotensive than in the hypertensive subjects (P < 0.05). Plasma renin activity and adrenalin showed better correlations with A-MBP than with I-MBP.
CONCLUSIONS: The drift of cuff systolic readings fell progressively below the intrabrachial values when BP increased, whilst diastolic cuff values approached the direct pressures. Since A-MBP did not significantly differ from I-MBP in any group, one must ask whether hypertension would be more correctly defined according to MBP criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8021578     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01124.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  3 in total

1.  A Meta-analysis to Determine the Validity of Taking Blood Pressure Using the Indirect Cuff Method.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Minsoo Kang; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Systolic blood pressure amplification and waveform calibration.

Authors:  Siegfried Wassertheurer; Bernhard Hametner; James Sharman; Thomas Weber
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Phenomenon of declining blood pressure in elderly--high systolic levels are undervalued with Korotkoff method.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Siennicki-Lantz; Sölve Elmståhl
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.921

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.